Cited by 124Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Carbon footprint of beef cattle

Open access
Desjardins, Raymond, Worth, Devon, Vergé, Xavier, Maxime, Dominique, Dyer, Jim, Cerkowniak, Darrel·2012·Sustainability

Abstract

The carbon footprint of beef cattle is presented for Canada, The United States, The European Union, Australia and Brazil. The values ranged between 8 and 22 kg CO2e per kg of live weight (LW) depending on the type of farming system, the location, the year, the type of management practices, the allocation, as well as the boundaries of the study. Substantial reductions have been observed for most of these countries in the last thirty years. For instance, in Canada the mean carbon footprint of beef cattle at the exit gate of the farm decreased from 18.2 kg CO2e per kg LW in 1981 to 9.5 kg CO2e per kg LW in 2006 mainly because of improved genetics, better diets, and more sustainable land management practices. Cattle production results in products other than meat, such as hides, offal and products for rendering plants; hence the environmental burden must be distributed between these useful products. In order to do this, the cattle carbon footprint needs to be reported in kg of CO2e per kg of product. For example, in Canada in 2006, on a mass basis, the carbon footprint of cattle by-products at the exit gate of the slaughterhouse was 12.9 kg CO2e per kg of product. Based on an economic allocation, the carbon footprints of meat (primal cuts), hide, offal and fat, bones and other products for rendering were 19.6, 12.3, 7 and 2 kg CO2e per kg of product, respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su4123279

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several life cycle assessment studies have concluded that grass-finished beef systems have greater greenhouse gas intensities than feedlot-finished beef systems.

    “Using life cycle analysis (LCA), several studies have concluded that grass-finished beef systems have greater GHG intensities than feedlot-finished (FL) beef systems.”

    From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Desjardins et al., 2012

    Section 2 says grass-finished cattle's lower feed-input footprint is usually offset by slower weight gain and longer methane-producing periods than for feedlot-finished cattle. The Introduction describes carbon-footprint estimation as based on LCA guidelines, but the cited passages do not establish that several comparative LCA studies reached the stated conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There remains substantial uncertainty about soil carbon change over time in managed grasslands.

    “However, there remains substantial uncertainty about soil C change over time in managed grasslands”

    From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Desjardins et al., 2012

    The Discussion and Conclusions section says uncertainty in soil carbon change remains, estimating it at ±20% nationally and likely higher at smaller spatial scales. But this discussion concerns land management and agricultural soils generally, not specifically managed grasslands; Section 3.1 says the impact of grazing on soil carbon sequestration was not included. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Johnson, D.E.; Phetteplace, H.W.; Seidl, A.F.; Schneider, U.A.; McCarl, B.A. Management Variations for U.S. Beef Production Systems: Effects on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Profitability. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation Conference, Beijing, China, 17-21 November 2003; China Coal Information Institute: Beijing, China, 2003; pp. 953-961.
  2. Maxime, D.; Vergé, X.P.C.; Arcand, Y.; Desjardins, R.L. A Cradle-to-Gate Assessment of the Carbon Footprint of Canadian Dairy Products. In LCA XI Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, 2012. Available online: http://lcacenter.org/lcaxi/abstracts/426.htm/ (accessed on 12 September 2012).
  3. Puig, R., Notarnicola, B., Raggi, A., Eds.; Franco Angeli: Milan, Italy, 2008; pp. 99-158.
  4. U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Annual Survey of Manufacturers, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010. Data gathered from American FactFinder. Available at http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/ index.xhtml/ (accessed on 19 September 2012).
  5. Wu, P.F.; Mittal, P.F. Characterication of provincially inspected slaughterhouse wastewater in Ontario. Can. Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 53, 6.9-6.18.
  6. Feitz, A.J.; Lundie, S.; Dennien, G.; Morain, M.; Jones, M. Generation of an industry-specific physico-chemical allocation matrix. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2007, 12, 109-117.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desjardins, R., Worth, D., Vergé, X., Maxime, D., Dyer, J., & Cerkowniak, D.
Affiliations
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
  • Private Consultant, Ottawa, ON, K2A 1G6, Canada
  • CIRAIG (CA)
  • Private Consultant, Cambridge, ON, N3H 3Z9, Canada
Corresponding author
Desjardins, Raymond
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2012-12-03
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
3279-3301
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080468116
Cited by
124
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
carbon footprint, beef cattle, greenhouse gas emissions, economic allocation, hides, offal, rendering, sustainable land management, beef production efficiency, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review