Cited by 109Global trade, sustainability, and social impactFood Supply Chain TraceabilitySustainable Supply Chain Management

Certification of Markets, Markets of Certificates: Tracing Sustainability in Global Agro-Food Value Chains

Open access
Mol, Arthur, Oosterveer, Peter·2015·Sustainability

Abstract

There is a blossoming of voluntary certification initiatives for sustainable agro-food products and production processes. With these certification initiatives come traceability in supply chains, to guarantee the sustainability of the products consumed. No systematic analysis exists of traceability systems for sustainability in agro-food supply chains. Hence, the purpose of this article is to analyze the prevalence of four different traceability systems to guarantee sustainability; to identify the factors that determine the kind of traceability systems applied in particular supply chains; and to assess what the emergence of economic and market logics in traceability mean for sustainability. Two conclusions are drawn. Globalizing markets for sustainable agro-food products induces the emergence of book-and-claim traceability systems, but the other three systems (identity preservation, segregation and mass balance) will continue to exist as different factors drive traceability requirements in different supply chains. Secondly, traceability itself is becoming a market driven by economic and market logics, and this may have consequences for sustainability in agro-food supply chains in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su70912258

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transparency is associated with positive outcomes in terms of sustainability, legitimacy, and fairness.

    “Respectively, transparency is associated with positive outcomes in terms of sustainability, legitimacy, and fairness.”

    From Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil (2020) · cites this paper as Mol, 2015

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says value-chain transparency is required to trace and verify sustainability claims, and Section 5 links greater transparency to consumer trust and reputational concerns. The paper does not establish positive outcomes for legitimacy or fairness, so the three-part claim goes beyond its account. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Transparency of one aspect can divert attention from, simplify or diminish the importance of others.

    “Thus, transparency of one aspect can divert attention from, simplify or diminish the importance of others (Flyverbom, 2016;Gardner et al., 2018;Mol and Oosterveer, 2015).”

    From Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil (2020) · cites this paper as Mol and Oosterveer, 2015

    Section 4.2 (Determining Factors; page unavailable) says institutional actors focus more on aggregated sustainability effects and less on individual, identifiable products. Section 5 (New Markets of Traceability; page unavailable) says some consumers prefer traceability systems that offer greater transparency about producers and resources. These passages support the idea that traceability systems emphasize different aspects, but not the claim that transparency about one aspect itself diverts attention from or diminishes the importance of others. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mol, A.P.J. Carbon flows, financial markets and the challenge of global environmental governance. Environ. Dev. 2012, 1, 10-24.
  2. Spaargaren, G.; Mol, A.P.J. Carbon Flows, Carbon Markets and Low-Carbon Lifestyles. Environ. Polit. 2013, 22, 174-193.
  3. Dallinger, J. Oil palm development in Thailand: Economic, social and environmental considerations. In Oil Palm Expansion in South East Asia: Trends and Implications for Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples; Colchester, M., Chao, S., Eds.; Forest Peoples Programme/Perkumpulan Sawit Watc: Bogor, Indonesia, 2011; pp. 24-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mol, A., & Oosterveer, P.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Oosterveer, Peter
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-09-08
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
12258-12278
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1600396606
Cited by
109
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7
FWCI
14.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
voluntary certification, traceability systems, agri-food supply chains, sustainability certification, identity preservation, segregation, mass balance, market logic, economic reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review