Cited by 721Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Products that go round: exploring product life extension through design

Bakker, Conny, Wang, Feng, Huisman, Jaco, den Hollander, Marcel·2014·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.028

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Between 2000 and 2010, product lifespans for consumer electronics fell on average 10%.

    “Between 2000 and 2010, product lifespans for consumer electronics fell on average 10% (Bakker et al., 2014; Prakash et al., 2016).”

    From Designed to break: planned obsolescence as corporate environmental crime (2022) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2014

  • The lifespan of energy-requiring consumer products fell from 2000 to 2005 by 1 to 20%, except for a lifespan increase for energy-saving lamps.

    “The lifespan of energy-requiring consumer products fell from 2000 to 2005 by 1 to 20%, except for a lifespan increase for energy-saving lamps.”

    From Designed to break: planned obsolescence as corporate environmental crime (2022) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2014

  • A refrigerator today lasts on average fourteen years and a laptop four years.

    “A refrigerator today lasts on average fourteen years and a laptop four years.”

    From Designed to break: planned obsolescence as corporate environmental crime (2022) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2014

  • A study on household goods and electronics in the Netherlands noted product durability discrepancies.

    “Product durability discrepancies were also noted in a study on household goods and electronics in the Netherlands (Bakker et al., 2014).”

    From Designed to break: planned obsolescence as corporate environmental crime (2022) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakker, C., Wang, F., Huisman, J., & den Hollander, M.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • United Nations University (DE)
Corresponding author
Bakker, Conny
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
69
Pages
10-16
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005386442
Cited by
721
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 10
FWCI
89.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
product life extension, product lifetime, refrigerators, notebooks, energy efficiency, environmental impact, refurbishment, remanufacturing, product recycling, sustainable design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review