The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation
Open accessAbstract
The topic of green innovation (GI) has increasingly attained organizational relevance due to its contribution to the satisfaction of environmental needs while concurrently enabling companies to differentiate themselves from their competitors, and hence attain sustainable competitive advantages. In this context, we conducted a detailed analysis of 618 papers on green innovation from the Web of Science (WoS) database for the 1971–2015 period. This paper develops a bibliometric analysis with the aim of assessing the key papers in the field and identifying the most substantive contributions to the literature. This study presents the following findings: (i) the chronological development of the discipline; (ii) the research trends and popular issues in this field; (iii) the antecedent variables acting as key drivers of GI in these studies; and (iv) the main outcomes of GI. Therefore, this paper provides the past, the present and the potential future of this specific topic and serves as an orientation and guide for researchers who are new to the topic of GI; it also enhances their knowledge concerning which journals, authors and articles they may consult while creating their theoretical framework or designing future research models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability1
Melville, N. P. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721412 · Cited by 868
Cited by
Singh, S. K., Giudice, M. D., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762 · Cited by 2,100
A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development
Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162 · Cited by 816
Aftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3219 · Cited by 452
Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: a bibliometric analysis
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2017-0497 · Cited by 346
Green Entrepreneurship for Sustainability Business: A Bibliometric Analysis
Manoharan, A. A., Rangaswamy, G., Muthukkannu, G., Sabapathi, S., Anandharaman, K., & N., A. A. T. (2024) · Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review · doi:10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe03204 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-06-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1011
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2625875789
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su9061011
- The paper
- Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.