Cited by 20RNA modifications and cancerMachine Learning in BioinformaticsRNA regulation and disease

M6A-BERT-Stacking: a tissue-specific predictor for identifying RNA N6-methyladenosine sites based on bert and stacking strategy

Open access
Li, Qianyue, Cheng, Xin, Song, Chen, Liu, Taigang·2023·Symmetry

Abstract

As the most abundant RNA methylation modification, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) could regulate asymmetric and symmetric division of hematopoietic stem cells and play an important role in various diseases. Therefore, the precise identification of m6A sites around the genomes of different species is a critical step to further revealing their biological functions and influence on these diseases. However, the traditional wet-lab experimental methods for identifying m6A sites are often laborious and expensive. In this study, we proposed an ensemble deep learning model called m6A-BERT-Stacking, a powerful predictor for the detection of m6A sites in various tissues of three species. First, we utilized two encoding methods, i.e., di ribonucleotide index of RNA (DiNUCindex_RNA) and k-mer word segmentation, to extract RNA sequence features. Second, two encoding matrices together with the original sequences were respectively input into three different deep learning models in parallel to train three sub-models, namely residual networks with convolutional block attention module (Resnet-CBAM), bidirectional long short-term memory with attention (BiLSTM-Attention), and pre-trained bidirectional encoder representations from transformers model for DNA-language (DNABERT). Finally, the outputs of all sub-models were ensembled based on the stacking strategy to obtain the final prediction of m6A sites through the fully connected layer. The experimental results demonstrated that m6A-BERT-Stacking outperformed most of the existing methods based on the same independent datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/sym15030731

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transformers are well-suited to learn sequence data of biology, including DNA, RNA, and protein sequence learning, genomic regulatory prediction, protein function annotation, protein design, and further adaptation into medical image and gene expression analysis.

    “It makes it well-suited to learn the sequence data of biology [76], including the DNA [6], RNA [77], and protein [7] sequence learning, genomic regulatory prediction [78], protein function annotation [79], protein design [80], and further adaptation into medical image [81] and gene expression analysis [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., Cheng, X., Song, C., & Liu, T.
Affiliations
Shanghai Ocean University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Taigang
Venue
Symmetry
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-03-15
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
731
ISSN
2073-8994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4324385651
Cited by
20
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Symmetry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11601324)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
N6-methyladenosine, RNA methylation, m6A site prediction, ensemble learning, stacking, BERT, DNABERT, k-mer features, BiLSTM-Attention, hematopoietic stem cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review