Cited by 66Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 206 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship between Typical Environmental Endocrine Disruptors and Kidney Disease

Open access

Abstract

Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are exogenous substances that alter the endocrine function of an organism, to result in adverse effects on growth and development, metabolism, and reproductive function. The kidney is one of the most important organs in the urinary system and an accumulation point. Studies have shown that EDCs can cause proteinuria, affect glomeruli and renal tubules, and even lead to diabetes and renal fibrosis in animal and human studies. In this review, we discuss renal accumulation of select EDCs such as dioxins, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), bisphenol A (BPA), and phthalates, and delineate how exposures to such EDCs cause renal lesions and diseases, including cancer. The regulation of typical EDCs with specific target genes and the activation of related pathways are summarized.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/toxics11010032

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Items 201–204 of 204

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 206 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hussein, 2015, Histopathological study of lung, kidney, spleen and prostate in adult male rats treated with Bisphenol A, Basrah J. Vet. Res., 14, 74
  2. Mourad, 2012, The sensetivity of liver, kidney andtestis of rats to oxidative stress induced by different doses of bisphenol A, Life, 50, 19

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X., Flaws, J. A., Spinella, M. J., & Irudayaraj, J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Irudayaraj, Joseph
Venue
Toxics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-29
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
32
ISSN
2305-6304 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313362030
Cited by
63
References
206
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 8
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • External Research Board, OVCRI, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (R01ES034112-01A1)
  • NIEHS (R01ES034112-01A1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, kidney disease, dioxins, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, bisphenol A, phthalates, proteinuria, glomerular lesions, renal tubules, renal fibrosis, kidney cancer, renal accumulation, target genes, signaling pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review