Cited by 95Toxoplasma gondii Research StudiesCoccidia and coccidiosis researchParasitic infections in humans and animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in Toxoplasma gondii Vaccines: Current Strategies and Challenges for Vaccine Development

Open access
Chu, Ki-Back, Quan, Fu-Shi·2021·Vaccines

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis, caused by the apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii, is one of the most damaging parasite-borne zoonotic diseases of global importance. While approximately one-third of the entire world’s population is estimated to be infected with T. gondii, an effective vaccine for human use remains unavailable. Global efforts in pursuit of developing a T. gondii vaccine have been ongoing for decades, and novel innovative approaches have been introduced to aid this process. A wide array of vaccination strategies have been conducted to date including, but not limited to, nucleic acids, protein subunits, attenuated vaccines, and nanoparticles, which have been assessed in rodents with promising results. Yet, translation of these in vivo results into clinical studies remains a major obstacle that needs to be overcome. In this review, we will aim to summarize the current advances in T. gondii vaccine strategies and address the challenges hindering vaccine development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/vaccines9050413

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Brief diagram depicting T. gondii target antigens and the vaccine platforms used to assess their efficacies in animal models.
Figure 1 Brief diagram depicting T. gondii target antigens and the vaccine platforms used to assess their efficacies in animal models.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 95

Metadata

Authors
Chu, K.-B., & Quan, F.-S.
Affiliations
Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
Quan, Fu-Shi
Venue
Vaccines
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-21
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
413
ISSN
2076-393X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3152765551
Cited by
92
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (2018R1A6A1A03025124)
  • Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HV20C0085, HV20C0142)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Coccidia and coccidiosis research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
Keywords
Toxoplasma gondii, toxoplasmosis, vaccine development, zoonotic parasitic disease, nucleic acid vaccines, subunit vaccine, live attenuated vaccine, nanoparticle vaccine, clinical translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review