The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytoremediation Prospects for Restoration of Contamination in the Natural Ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Toxic substances have a deleterious effect on biological systems if accrued in ecosystems beyond their acceptable limit. A natural ecosystem can become contaminated due to the excessive release of toxic substances by various anthropogenic and natural activities, which necessitates rehabilitation of the environmental contamination. Phytoremediation is an eco-friendly and cost-efficient method of biotechnological mitigation for the remediation of polluted ecosystems and revegetation of contaminated sites. The information provided in this review was collected by utilizing various sources of research information, such as ResearchGate, Google Scholar, the Scopus database and other relevant resources. In this review paper, we discuss (i) various organic and inorganic contaminants; (ii) sources of contamination and their adverse effects on terrestrial and aquatic life; (iii) approaches to the phytoremediation process, including phytoextraction, rhizoremediation, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, rhizofiltration, phytodegradation, phytodesalination and phytohydraulics, and their underlying mechanisms; (iv) the functions of various microbes and plant enzymes in the biodegradation process and their potential applications; and (v) advantages and limitations of the phytoremediation technique. The reported research aimed to adequately appraise the efficacy of the phytoremediation treatment and facilitate a thorough understanding of specific contaminants and their underlying biodegradation pathways. Detailed procedures and information regarding characteristics of ideal plants, sources of heavy metal contamination, rhizodegradation techniques, suitable species and removal of these contaminants are put forward for further application. Scientists, planners and policymakers should focus on evaluating possible risk-free alternative techniques to restore polluted soil, air and water bodies by involving local inhabitants and concerned stakeholders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Existing reviews have focused on the safe disposal of contaminated biomass (Edgar et al. 2021;Khan et al. 2023b).”
From Sustainable management of post-phytoremediation biomass (2025) · cites this paper as Khan et al. 2023b
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Reusing the contaminated biomass can minimize the release of contaminants into the environment (Khan et al. 2023b), and available post-treatment disposal and handling methods for post-phytoremediation biomass have been extensively reviewed.”
From Sustainable management of post-phytoremediation biomass (2025) · cites this paper as Khan et al. 2023b
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of cadmium toxicity
Genchi, G., Sinicropi, M. S., Lauria, G., Carocci, A., & Catalano, A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17113782 · Cited by 2,722
Removal of heavy metals in contaminated soil by phytoremediation mechanism: a review
Awa, S. H., & Hadibarata, T. (2020) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-020-4426-0 · Cited by 414
Phytovolatilization of Organic Contaminants
Limmer, M., & Burken, J. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04113 · Cited by 305
Research works printed but not linked: 116
- Antoniadis, 2019, A critical prospective analysis of the potential toxicity of trace element regulation limits in soils worldwide: Are they protective concerning health risk assessment?—A review, Environ. Int., 127, 819, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.039 · DOI
- Mehmood, 2018, Assessment of Some Trace Elements and Heavy Metals in river Jhelum of Kashmir Valley, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Sci., 10, 27
- Rafique, 2016, Distribution and source apportionment studies of heavy metals in soil of cotton/wheat fields, Environ. Monit. Assess., 188, 309, 10.1007/s10661-016-5309-0 · DOI
- Iqbal, 2016, Response surface methodology application in optimization of cadmium adsorption by shoe waste: A good option of waste mitigation by waste, Ecol. Eng., 88, 265, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.12.041 · DOI
- Farahat, 2015, The effect of long-term wastewater irrigation on accumulation and transfer of heavy metals in Cupressus sempervirens leaves and adjacent soils, Sci. Total Environ., 15, 1, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.032 · DOI
- Patil, Y.B., and Rao, P. (2013). Applied Bioremediation—Active and Passive Approaches, IntechOpen Limited. · DOI
- Mandal, 2014, Status on Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals in India—A Review, Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manag., 5, 553, 10.5958/0976-4038.2014.00609.5 · DOI
- Chen, 2016, Modeling and evaluation of urban pollution events of atmospheric heavy metals from a large Cu-smelter, Sci. Total Environ., 1, 17, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.117 · DOI
- Muradoglu, 2015, Cadmium toxicity affects chlorophyll a and b content, antioxidant enzyme activities and mineral nutrient accumulation in strawberry, Biol. Res., 48, 11, 10.1186/s40659-015-0001-3 · DOI
- Kristanti, 2021, Rhizofiltration for Removal of Inorganic and Organic Pollutants in Groundwater: A Review, Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem., 11, 12326, 10.33263/BRIAC114.1232612347 · DOI
- Fu, 2011, Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review, J. Environ. Manag., 92, 407, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Ahmaruzzaman, 2011, Industrial wastes as low-cost potential adsorbents for the treatment of wastewater laden with heavy metals, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 10, 36, 10.1016/j.cis.2011.04.005 · DOI
- Yaqoob, 2019, Current scenario of phytoremediation: Progresses and limitations, Int. J. Biosci., 14, 191
- Vamerali, 2010, Field crops for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated land. A review, Environ. Chem. Lett., 8, 1, 10.1007/s10311-009-0268-0 · DOI
- Robinson, 2003, Uptake and distribution of nickel and other metals in the hyperaccumulator Berkheya Coddii, New Phytol., 158, 279, 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00743.x · DOI · Paper page
- Borisev, 2009, Phytoextraction of Cd, Ni, and Pb Using Four Willow Clones (Salix spp.), Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 18, 553
- Tripathi, 2016, Towards the coupling of phytoremediation with bioenergy production, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 57, 1386, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.116 · DOI
- Bokhari, 2016, Phytoremediation potential of Lemna minor L. for heavy metals, Int. J. Phytoremediat., 18, 25, 10.1080/15226514.2015.1058331 · DOI
- Bhat, R., Hakeem, K., and Dervash, M. (2020). Bioremediation and Biotechnology, Springer. · DOI
- Farraji, 2016, Advantages and disadvantages of phytoremediation: A concise review, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (IJEST), 2, 69
- 2005, Phytoremediation, Annu. Reviewof. Plant Biol., 56, 15, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144214 · DOI
- Cunningham, 1996, Phytoremediation of Soils Contaminated with Organic Pollutants, Advances in Agronomy, Volume 56, 55, 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60179-0 · DOI
- Ghosh, 2005, A Review on Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals and Utilization of Its Byproducts, Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 3, 1, 10.15666/aeer/0301_001018 · DOI
- Hutchinson, 2001, Phytoremediation of aged petroleum sludge: Effect of inorganic fertilizer, J. Environ. Qual., 30, 395, 10.2134/jeq2001.302395x · DOI
- Joner, 2003, Phytoremediation of organic pollutants using mycorrhizal plants: A new aspect of rhizosphere interactions, Agronomie, 23, 495, 10.1051/agro:2003021 · DOI
- Bhat, 2022, Phytoremediation of heavy metals in soil and water: An eco-friendly, sustainable and multidisciplinary approach, Chemosphere, 303, 100774, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134788 · DOI
- Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Mms, C.-P., Chaturvedi, A.K., Shabnam, A.A., Subrahmanyam, G., Mondal, R., Gupta, D.K., Malyan, S.K., and Kumar, S.S. (2020). Lead Toxicity: Health Hazards, Influence on Food Chain, and Sustainable Remediation Approaches. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17. · DOI
- Tangahu, 2011, A Review on Heavy Metals (As, Pb, and Hg) Uptake by Plants through Phytoremediation, Int. J. Chem. Eng., 2011, 939161, 10.1155/2011/939161 · DOI · Paper page
- Babu, S.M.O.F., Hossain, M.B., Rahman, M.S., Rahman, M., Ahmed, A.S.S., Hasan, M.M., Rakib, A., Emran, T.B., Xiao, J., and Simal-Gandara, J. (2021). Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals: A Sustainable Green Solution for Clean Environment. Appl. Sci., 11. · DOI
- Yan, 2020, Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land, Front. Plant Sci., 11, 359, 10.3389/fpls.2020.00359 · DOI · Paper page
- Finnegan, 2012, Arsenic toxicity: The effects on plant metabolism, Front. Physiol., 6, 182
- Mandal, 2017, An insight of environmental contamination of arsenic on animal health, Emerg. Contam., 3, 17, 10.1016/j.emcon.2017.01.004 · DOI
- Han, 2019, Toxic effects of arsenic on growth, hematological parameters, and plasma components of starry flounder, Platichthys stellatus, at two water temperature conditions, Fish. Aquat. Sci., 22, 3, 10.1186/s41240-019-0116-5 · DOI
- Kumar, 2021, Bio-remediation approaches for alleviation of cadmium contamination in natural resources, Chemosphere, 268, 128855, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128855 · DOI
- Haider, 2011, Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 211, 111887, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111887 · DOI
- Outridge, 1993, Bioaccumulation and toxicology of chromium: Implications for wildlife, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 130, 31
- Aslam, 2017, Chromium toxicity in fish: A review article, J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 5, 1483
- Kapoor, 2022, Accumulation of chromium in plants and its repercussion in animals and humans, Environ. Pollut., 15, 119044, 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119044 · DOI
- Wani, Z.A., Ahmad, Z., Asgher, M., Bhat, J.A., Sharma, M., Kumar, A., Sharma, V., Kumar, A., Pant, S., and Lukatkin, A.S. (2023). Phytoremediation of Potentially Toxic Elements: Role, Status and Concerns. Plants, 12. · DOI
- Wang, 2013, Effects of Copper on Organisms: A Review, Adv. Mater. Res., 726–731, 340
- Gupta, R.C. (2018). Veterinary Toxicology, Academic Press. [3rd ed.]. · DOI
- Gomez-Olivan, L. (2019). Pollution of Water Bodies in Latin America, Springer. · DOI
- Zheng, 2019, The Toxicological Effects of Mercury Exposure in Marine Fish, Bull Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 102, 714, 10.1007/s00128-019-02593-2 · DOI
- Gworek, 2020, Mercury in the terrestrial environment: A review, Environ. Sci. Eur., 32, 1, 10.1186/s12302-020-00401-x · DOI
- Bittner, 2014, Molybdenum metabolism in plants and crosstalk to iron, Front. Plant Sci., 5, 28, 10.3389/fpls.2014.00028 · DOI
- Novotny, 2018, Molybdenum, Adv. Nutr., 9, 272, 10.1093/advances/nmx001 · DOI
- 2007, The Influences of Nickel Exposure on Selected Physiological Parameters and Gill Structure in the Teleost Fish, Oreochromis niloticus, J. Biol. Sci., 7, 77
- Kumar, 2021, Nickel in terrestrial biota: Comprehensive review on contamination, toxicity, tolerance and its remediation approaches, Chemosphere, 275, 129996, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129996 · DOI
- Hassan, 2019, Nickel toxicity in plants: Reasons, toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and remediation possibilities—A review, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 26, 12673, 10.1007/s11356-019-04892-x · DOI
- Plum, 2010, The essential toxin: Impact of zinc on human health, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 7, 1342, 10.3390/ijerph7041342 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaur, 2021, Zinc toxicity in plants: A review, Planta, 253, 129, 10.1007/s00425-021-03642-z · DOI
- Silvern, S., and Young, S. (2013). Environmental Change and Sustainability, Intech Open. · DOI
- Shaw, A.J. (1990). Evolutionary Aspects, CRC Press.
- Mganga, 2011, Classification of Plants According to Their Heavy Metal Content around North Mara Gold Mine, Tanzania: Implication for Phytoremediation, Tanzan. J. Sci., 37, 109
- Cunningham, 1996, Promises and Prospects of Phytoremediation, Plant Physiol., 110, 715, 10.1104/pp.110.3.715 · DOI
- Rascio, 2011, Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulating Plants: How and Why Do They Do It? And What Makes Them So Interesting?, Plant Sci., 180, 169, 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
- Bian, 2018, Chelant-Induced Phytoextraction of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Soils: A Review, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 27, 2417, 10.15244/pjoes/81207 · DOI
- Sparks, 2011, Phytostabilization: A Green Approach to Contaminant Containment, Advances in Agronomy, Volume 112, 145, 10.1016/B978-0-12-385538-1.00004-4 · DOI
- Singh, 2022, Potential of indigenous plant species for phytoremediation of arsenic contaminated water and soil, Ecol. Eng., 175, 106476, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106476 · DOI
- Patel, 2015, Phytoremediation of Copper and Lead by Using Sunflower, Indian Mustard and Water Hyacinth Plants, Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR), 4, 113
- Bhattacharya, 2022, First Report of the Hyperaccumulating Potential of Cadmium and Lead by Cleome rutidosperma DC. With a Brief Insight into the Chemical Vocabulary of its Roots, Front. Environ. Sci., 10, 87, 10.3389/fenvs.2022.830087 · DOI
- Reddy, 2012, Accumulation of Chromium in Certain plant Species Growing on Mine Dump from Byrapur, Karnataka, India, Res. J. Chem. Sci., 2, 17
- Kumari, 2019, An overview of phytomining: A metal extraction process from plant species, J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. (JETIR), 6, 1367
- Capuana, 2020, A review of the performance of woody and herbaceous ornamental plants for phytoremediation in urban areas, Iforest—Biogeosci. For., 13, 139, 10.3832/ifor3242-013 · DOI
- Hakeem, K., Bhat, R., and Qadri, H. (2020). Bioremediation and Biotechnology, Springer. · DOI
- Kumar, 2023, Microplastics in terrestrial ecosystems: Un-ignorable impacts on soil characterises, nutrient storage and its cycling, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem., 158, 116869, 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116869 · DOI
- Lee, 2012, Growth promotion of Xanthium italicum by application of rhizobacterial isolates of Bacillus aryabhattai in microcosm soil, J. Microbiol., 50, 45, 10.1007/s12275-012-1415-z · DOI
- Pimviriyakul, 2020, Microbial degradation of halogenated aromatics: Molecular mechanisms and enzymatic reactions, Microb. Biotechnol., 13, 67, 10.1111/1751-7915.13488 · DOI
- Sood, 2016, Carboxylesterases: Sources, Characterization and Broader Applications, Insights Enzyme Res., 1, 1
- Raunio, 2015, Modeling of interactions between xenobiotics and cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, Front. Pharmacol., 6, 123, 10.3389/fphar.2015.00123 · DOI
- Lee, 1998, New perspectives on microbial dehalogenation of chlorinated solvents: Insights from the field, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 52, 423, 10.1146/annurev.micro.52.1.423 · DOI
- Hasanuzzaman, M., and Prasad, M.N.V. (2021). Handbook of Bioremediation, Academic Press.
- Karich, 2017, Fungal Unspecific Peroxygenases Oxidize the Majority of Organic EPA Priority Pollutants, Front. Microbiol., 8, 1463, 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01463 · DOI
- Christian, 2005, Degradation of xenobiotic compounds by lignin-degrading white-rot fungi: Enzymology and mechanisms involved, Indian J. Exp. Biol., 43, 301
- Balcazar-Lopez, E., Mendez-Lorenzo, L.H., Batista-Garcia, R.A., Esquivel-Naranjo, U., Ayala, M., Kumar, V.V., Savary, O., Cabana, H., Herrera-Estrella, A., and Folch-Mallol, J.L. (2016). Xenobiotic Compounds Degradation by Heterologous Expression of a Trametes sanguineus Laccase in Trichoderma atroviride. PLoS ONE, 5. · DOI
- Schaffner, 2002, Genes and Enzymes for In-Planta Phytoremediation of Air, Water and Soil, Acta Biotechnol., 22, 141, 10.1002/1521-3846(200205)22:1/2<141::AID-ABIO141>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
- Ogunyemi, 2022, Nitrilase gene detection and nitrile metabolism in two bacterial strains associated with waste streams in Lagos, Nigeria, Bull Natl. Res. Cent., 46, 151, 10.1186/s42269-022-00804-1 · DOI
- Kitts, 2000, Type I nitroreductases in soil enterobacteria reduce TNT (2,4,6-trinitrotoluene) and RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine), Can. J. Microbiol., 46, 278, 10.1139/w99-134 · DOI
- Chen, 2014, Novel three-component Rieske non-heme iron oxygenase system catalyzing the N-dealkylation of chloroacetanilide herbicides in sphingomonads DC-6 and DC-2, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 80, 5078, 10.1128/AEM.00659-14 · DOI
- Karagianni, 2015, Homologues of xenobiotic metabolizing N-acetyltransferases in plant-associated fungi: Novel functions for an old enzyme family, Sci. Rep., 5, 12900, 10.1038/srep12900 · DOI
- Kolhe, 2015, Degradation of Phenol Containing Wastewater by Advance Catalysis System—A Review, Annu. Res. Rev. Biol., 8, 1, 10.9734/ARRB/2015/19936 · DOI
- Ambreen, 2020, Isolation and characterization of organophosphorus phosphatases from Bacillus thuringiensis MB497 capable of degrading Chlorpyrifos, Triazophos and Dimethoate, Heliyon, 6, e04221, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04221 · DOI
- Peco, J.D., Higueras, P., Campos, J.A., Esbri, J.M., Moreno, M.M., Battaglia-Brunet, F., and Sandalio, L.M. (2021). Abandoned Mine Lands Reclamation by Plant Remediation Technologies. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
- Lorestani, 2013, Phytoextraction and phytostabilization potential of plants grown in the vicinity of heavy metal-contaminated soils: A case study at an industrial town site, Environ. Monit. Assess., 185, 10217, 10.1007/s10661-013-3326-9 · DOI
- Wu, 2021, Evaluation of phytoremediation potential of native dominant plants and spatial distribution of heavy metals in abandoned mining area in Southwest China, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 220, 112368, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112368 · DOI
- Zeng, 2018, Phytostabilization potential of ornamental plants grown in soil contaminated with cadmium, Int. J. Phytoremediat., 20, 311, 10.1080/15226514.2017.1381939 · DOI
- Siyar, R., Doulati-Ardejani, F., Norouzi, P., Maghsoudy, S., Yavarzadeh, M., Taherdangkoo, R., and Butscher, C. (2022). Phytoremediation Potential of Native Hyperaccumulator Plants Growing on Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil of Khatunabad Copper Smelter and Refinery, Iran. Water, 14. · DOI
- Greipsson, 2011, Phytoremediation, Nat. Educ. Knowl., 3, 7
- Newman, 2004, Phytodegradation of organic compounds, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 15, 225, 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.04.006 · DOI
- Guarino, 2020, Arsenic phytovolatilization and epigenetic modifications in Arundo donax L. assisted by a PGPR consortium, Chemosphere, 251, 126310, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126310 · DOI
- Nedjimi, 2021, Phytoremediation: A sustainable environmental technology for heavy metals decontamination, SN Appl. Sci., 3, 286, 10.1007/s42452-021-04301-4 · DOI
- Narayanan, 1995, Fate of volatile chlorinated organic compounds in a laboratory chamber with alfalfa plants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 2437, 10.1021/es00009a041 · DOI
- Ashraf, M., Ozturk, M., and Ahmad, M.S.A. (2010). Plant Adaptation and Phytoremediation, Springer. · DOI
- Woraharn, 2021, Potential of ornamental monocot plants for rhizofiltration of cadmium and zinc in hydroponic systems, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 35157, 10.1007/s11356-021-13151-x · DOI
- Han, Y., Lee, J., Kim, C., Park, J., Lee, M., and Yang, M. (2021). Uranium Rhizofiltration by Lactuca sativa, Brassica campestris L., Raphanus sativus L., Oenanthe javanica under Different Hydroponic Conditions. Minerals, 11. · DOI
- Kafle, 2022, Phytoremediation: Mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents, Environ. Adv., 8, 100203, 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203 · DOI
- Jha, 2016, Remediation of textile azo dye acid red 114 by hairy roots of Ipomoea carnea Jacq. and assessment of degraded dye toxicity with human keratinocyte cell line, J. Hazard. Mater., 311, 158, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.058 · DOI
- Doty, 2003, Metabolism of the soil and groundwater contaminants, ethylene dibromide and trichloroethylene, by the tropical leguminous tree, Leuceana leucocephala, Water Res., 37, 441, 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00291-9 · DOI
- Grigore, M.N. (2020). Handbook of Halophytes, Springer. · DOI
- Rozema, 2014, Plant species for the removal of Na+ and Cl from greenhouse nutrient solution, Hort. Sci., 49, 1071
- Sarath, N.G., Sruthi, P., Shackira, A.M., and Puthur, J.T. (2021). Frontiers in Plant-Soil Interaction, Academic Press.
- Cardenas, 2019, Phytodesalination of a moderately saline soil combined with two inorganic amendments, Bragantia, 78, 579, 10.1590/1678-4499.20190031 · DOI
- Zorrig, 2012, Phytodesalination: A Solution for Salt-affected Soils in Arid and Semi-arid Regions, J. Arid. Land Stud., 22, 299
- Gatliff, 1994, Vegetative Remediation Process Offers Advantages over Traditional Pump and-Treat Technologies, Remediation, 4, 343, 10.1002/rem.3440040307 · DOI
- Ahmadpour, 2012, Phytoremediation of heavy metals: A green technology, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11, 14036
- Hasnaoui, S.E., Fahr, M., Keller, C., Levard, C., Angeletti, B., Chaurand, P., Triqui, Z.E.A., Guedira, A., Rhazi, L., and Colin, F. (2020). Screening of Native Plants Growing on a Pb/Zn Mining Area in Eastern Morocco: Perspectives for Phytoremediation. Plants, 9. · DOI
- Singh, S.N., and Tripathi, R.D. (2007). Environmental Bioremediation Technologies, Springer Science & Business Media. · DOI
- Henderson, 2006, Phytoremediation of pesticide wastes in soil, Z. Für Nat., 61, 213, 10.1515/znc-2006-3-410 · DOI
- Zhao, 2003, Influence of microbial inoculation (Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP), the enzyme atrazine chlorohydrolase, and vegetation on the degradation of atrazine and metolachlor in soil, J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 3043, 10.1021/jf025954i · DOI
- Prasad, M.N.V. (2007). Phytoremediation: Methods and Review, Neil Willey Center for Research in Plant Science, University of the West of England.
- Singh, P., Kumar, A., and Borthakur, A. (2020). Abatement of Environmental Pollutants, Elsevier.
- Raj, 2020, Mercury remediation potential of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. for clean-up of flyash contaminated sites, Chemosphere, 248, 125857, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125857 · DOI
- Raklami, A., Meddich, A., Oufdou, K., and Baslam, M. (2022). Plants-Microorganisms-Based Bioremediation for Heavy Metal Cleanup: Recent Developments, Phytoremediation Techniques, Regulation Mechanisms, and Molecular Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23. · DOI
- Song, 2021, Removal of Pb2+ and Cd2+ from contaminated water using novel microbial material (Scoria@UF1), J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9, 106495, 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106495 · DOI
- Kumar, 2023, Application of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) techniques to remove heavy metal in the natural environment: A critical review, Chemosphere, 318, 137894, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137894 · DOI
- Song, 2022, Microbial-induced carbonate precipitation prevents Cd2+ migration through the soil profile, Sci. Total Environ., 844, 157167, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157167 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sustainable management of post-phytoremediation biomass
Mukherjee, S., Leri, A. C., Bandaranayaka, C., Vázquez-Núñez, E., Barros, R., Khan, A. H. A., Zhou, P., Zhang, T., Bernal, M. P., Clemente, R., et al. (2025) · Energy, Ecology and Environment · doi:10.1007/s40974-025-00364-w · Cited by 45
“Biochar production from biomass (contaminated or non-contaminated) is also an attractive alternate use of biomass, because, with this biochar, further removal and recovery of metal(loid)s is possible (Khan et al. 2023a).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, S., Masoodi, T. H., Pala, N. A., Murtaza, S., Mugloo, J. A., Sofi, P. A., Zaman, M. U., Kumar, R., & Kumar, A.
- Affiliations
- Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (IN)
- Faculty of Forestry, Sher e Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Benhama Ganderbal, Srinagar 191201, Jammu and Kashmir, India
- O. P. Jindal Global University (IN)
- Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Pala, Nazir A.
- Kumar, Amit
- Venue
- Water
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-04-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1498
- ISSN
- 2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4365147357
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Water (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Keywords
- phytoremediation, environmental contamination, heavy metal contamination, organic pollutants, phytoextraction, rhizoremediation, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, rhizofiltration, phytodegradation, phytodesalination, biodegradation, rhizodegradation, plant enzymes, microbial bioremediation, ecological restoration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoremediation Prospects for Restoration of Contamination in the Natural Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/w15081498
- The paper
- Khan, S., Masoodi, T. H., Pala, N. A., Murtaza, S., Mugloo, J. A., Sofi, P. A., Zaman, M. U., Kumar, R., & Kumar, A. (2023). Phytoremediation Prospects for Restoration of Contamination in the Natural Ecosystems. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081498