The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Irrigation Water Quality Standards for Indirect Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture: A Contribution toward Sustainable Wastewater Reuse in South Korea
Open accessAbstract
Climate change and the subsequent change in agricultural conditions increase the vulnerability of agricultural water use. Wastewater reuse is a common practice around the globe and is considered as an alternative water resource in a changing agricultural environment. Due to rapid urbanization, indirect wastewater reuse, which is the type of agricultural wastewater reuse that is predominantly practiced, will increase, and this can cause issues of unplanned reuse. Therefore, water quality standards are needed for the safe and sustainable practice of indirect wastewater reuse in agriculture. In this study, irrigation water quality criteria for wastewater reuse were discussed, and the standards and guidelines of various countries and organizations were reviewed to suggest preliminary standards for indirect wastewater reuse in South Korea. The proposed standards adopted a probabilistic consideration of practicality and classified the use of irrigation water into two categories: upland and rice paddy. The standards suggest guidelines for E. coli, electric conductivity (EC), turbidity, suspended solids (SS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), pH, odor, and trace elements. Through proposing the standards, this study attempts to combine features of both the conservative and liberal approaches, which in turn could suggest a new and sustainable practice of agricultural wastewater reuse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Study of urban population attitudes towards various wastewater reuse options: Israel as a case study
Friedler, E., Lahav, O., Jizhaki, H., & Lahav, T. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.013 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Worldwide Regulations and Guidelines for Agricultural Water Reuse: A Critical Review
Shoushtarian, F., & Negahban-Azar, M. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12040971 · Cited by 285
Water and sanitation: an essential battlefront in the war on antimicrobial resistance
Bürgmann, H., Frigon, D., H Gaze, W., M Manaia, C., Pruden, A., Singer, A. C., F Smets, B., & Zhang, T. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiy101 · Cited by 182
Milačič Ščančar, R., Kozlica, K., Marković, S., Leban, P., Vidmar, J., Heath, E., Kacjan Maršić, N., Železnikar, Š., & Ščančar, J. (2025) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics13090738 · Cited by 8
Application of slow sand filter for greywater treatment at GETFund hostel, UENR, Sunyani
Amankwah, E., Afedor, D., Mensah, N. J., & Nunoo, E. (2025) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e03088 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeong, H., Kim, H., & Jang, T.
- Venue
- Water
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-04-23
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 169
- ISSN
- 2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2336525405
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Irrigation Water Quality Standards for Indirect Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture: A Contribution toward Sustainable Wastewater Reuse in South Korea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/w8040169
- The paper
- Jeong, H., Kim, H., & Jang, T. (2016). Irrigation Water Quality Standards for Indirect Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture: A Contribution toward Sustainable Wastewater Reuse in South Korea. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.