CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEducational Technology and Pedagogy

Leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance teaching and learning in higher education: Promoting quality education and critical engagement

Open access
Ajani, Oluwatoyin A., Gamede, Bongani, Matiyenga, Tinashe C.·2024·Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
DOI 10.33902/jpsp.202528400
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This scoping review explores the role of Artificial Intelligence [AI] in enhancing teaching and learning in higher education, focusing on improving quality education and encouraging critical engagement. A thorough screening process led to the selection of 64 relevant, high-quality studies. Data from each article, including research goals, methods, findings, and ethical considerations, were systematically analysed to provide a well-rounded understanding of AI's impact on education. The review covers research from 2010 to 2024, examining how AI technologies like machine learning, natural language processing, and adaptive learning systems are being used in education. It highlights key benefits, such as personalised learning, better teaching strategies, and more efficient administrative processes. However, it also tackles challenges like data privacy, ethical concerns, and the digital divide. Using the Technology Acceptance Model and Self-Directed Learning theory as frameworks, the review looks at what influences the adoption and effectiveness of AI in higher education. While AI has the potential to significantly improve educational quality by providing tailored learning and fostering critical thinking, its success relies on overcoming ethical issues, ensuring fair access, and boosting digital literacy for both educators and students. The study emphasises the need for collaboration between educators, policymakers, and tech developers to make the most of AI’s potential while safeguarding the rights of all involved. It also offers recommendations for future research and practical steps to ensure AI is used responsibly and effectively in higher education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33902/jpsp.202528400

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Ally, M., Grimus, M., & Ebner, M. (2019). Preparing for the digital university: a review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 548- 567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09208-w · DOI
  2. Asio, J.M.R. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and academic performance of tertiary level students: a preliminary analysis. Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal), 5(2), 309 -321.
  3. Baker, R., & Smith, L. (2019). Enhancing learning through personalized learning systems. AI and Education, 2(1), 15-28.
  4. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Bridging the digital divide in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1439-1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-3 · DOI
  5. Brown, T., & Green, D. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence on assessments in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(2), 222-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520920799 · DOI
  6. Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2018). The role of metros in the global AI revolution. Economic Geography, 94(5), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1444982. · DOI
  7. Gupta, S., & Chen, H. (2022). The role of AI-driven platforms in fostering student engagement. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789674. · DOI
  8. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review.
  9. Hossain, M. S., Alamri, A., & Al-Rubaish, A. M. (2022). Use of AI-driven chatbots in higher education: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 497-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10592-4. · DOI
  10. Hossain, M. S., Alkhalaf, S., & Van-Hoof, H. B. (2022). Understanding the adoption of smart educational technologies: E-learning in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 1022-1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12567. · DOI
  11. Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2023a). AI in education: Challenges to pedagogy and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10010-x. · DOI
  12. Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2023b). Perceptions of AI in educational scenarios. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 1-17.
  13. Johnson, L., & Kumar, S. (2019). AI-driven analytics in higher education administration. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 51(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2018.1448153. · DOI
  14. Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Elsevier.
  15. Maphalala, M. C., & Ajani, O. A. (2024). Teaching and learning of computer science in higher education: a self-directed learning perspective. In C. Bosch, L. Goosen, & J. Chetty (Eds.), Navigating computer science education in the 21st century (pp. 89-111). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1066-3. · DOI
  16. ch005 · DOI
  17. Nguyen, T., & Walker, A. D. (2020). A review of the use of intelligent tutoring systems in education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100849. · DOI
  18. Okonkwo, C. G., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). AI in higher education administration: A revolution in governance. Education and Management Engineering, 11(1), 16-24.
  19. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A.,Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P. & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj. · DOI · Paper page
  20. n71 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Patel, S., & Jain, P. (2019). Understanding educational technology through AI. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 47-59.
  22. Ramachandran, R., Zhang, X., & Kumar, P. (2023a). Adaptive learning: The future of education. Educational Research Review, 31, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100364. · DOI
  23. Ramachandran, R., Zhang, X., & Kumar, P. (2023b). The impact of intelligent tutoring systems on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 160, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104092. · DOI
  24. Ramachandran, R., Zhang, X., & Kumar, P. (2023c). Addressing ethical concerns in the use of AI in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10029-8. · DOI
  25. Seymour, W., Smith, G., & Ajani, T. A. (2020). Bridging the gap: Ensuring access to AI technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 654-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12456. · DOI
  26. Sharma, P., Lee, H., & Gupta, A. (2020). Intelligent tutoring systems using artificial intelligence: A review. International Journal of Learning Technology, 15(2), 116-140.
  27. Siemens, G., & Gasevic, D. (2017). Artificial intelligence in education: Ethical considerations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 841-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9509-0. · DOI
  28. Smith, L., & Jones, F. (2018). Using AI to streamline educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2017-0028. · DOI
  29. Tang, S., & Sivanathan, A. (2021). Adaptive learning technologies in higher education: A comparative review. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 12-28.
  30. Williams, D., & Roberts, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Comprehensive insights and future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 675-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13159. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Ajani, O. A., Gamede, B., & Matiyenga, T. C.
Affiliations
University of Zululand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Ajani, Oluwatoyin A.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
Publisher
Journal of Pedagogical Research
Published
2024-10-20
ISSN
2687-3788 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.33902/jpsp.202528400
OpenAlex
W4403610861
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 3
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, higher education teaching and learning, quality education, critical engagement, personalized learning, adaptive learning systems, data privacy, AI ethics, digital divide, digital literacy, technology acceptance model, AI adoption in education, responsible AI use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review