Leveraging Existing Trained AI Models for Enhanced Interview Preparation
Open accessAbstract
Modern job markets require advanced planning techniques that tackle the changing intricacies of professional hiring procedures. The incorporation of artificial intelligence technologies into interview preparation signifies a groundbreaking progress in career development, utilizing pre-trained models to establish thorough training settings. Natural language processing technologies, speech recognition systems, and machine learning models integrate to create flexible platforms that react dynamically to specific candidate needs across various sectors and professional environments. Virtual reality settings augmented with generative conversational AI offer engaging training experiences that closely mimic real interview situations, along with comprehensive performance analysis and tailored feedback systems. Multimodal learning strategies combine textual, auditory, visual, and behavioral data streams to create comprehensive candidate evaluations and specific skill enhancement suggestions. Tailored adaptive learning systems employ advanced algorithms to personalize educational material according to learner traits, preferences, and real-time performance data, with gamification features boosting engagement and motivation during the training experience. Enhanced evaluation frameworks show marked advancements in candidate confidence, communication skills, and overall interview effectiveness when compared to conventional preparation strategies. Ethical considerations encompass confronting algorithmic bias, protecting privacy, and addressing digital accessibility challenges to guarantee equitable access for diverse groups. The broad availability of advanced interview preparation tools via AI-driven platforms possesses significant potential to lessen employment gaps and foster more inclusive hiring approaches, while achieving a balance between technological advancement and the preservation of personal authenticity in professional interactions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gupta found that AI-assisted strategies serve as effective tools for facilitating individualized learning and the development of professional skills.
“Similarly, Gupta found that AI-assisted strategies serve as effective tools for facilitating individualized learning and the development of professional skills [47].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Peng, H., Ma, S., & Spector, J. M. (2019) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-019-0089-y · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Effects of Gamification on Behavioral Change in Education: A Meta-Analysis
Kim, J.-H., & Castelli, D. M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18073550 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Ajani, O. A., Gamede, B., & Matiyenga, T. C. (2024) · Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology · doi:10.33902/jpsp.202528400 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Nofal, A., Ali, H. M., Hadi, M., Ahmad, A., Qayyum, A., Johri, A., Al‐Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100347 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Mock Interviews: Leveraging AI Resources To Enhance Professional Skills
Crutsinger, C. A., & Herrera, U. (2022) · Breaking Boundaries · doi:10.31274/itaa.13883 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Matthew G. Hanna et al., "Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning," Science Direct, March 2025. Available:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893395224002667
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwiarini, M., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04840-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Similarly, Gupta found that AI-assisted strategies serve as effective tools for facilitating individualized learning and the development of professional skills [47].”
- Authors
- Gupta, S.
- Affiliations
- Meta (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sameeksha Gupta
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies
- Published
- 2025-07-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 479-485
- ISSN
- 2709-104X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412167618
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- interview preparation, pre-trained language models, virtual reality training, adaptive learning, gamification, algorithmic bias, privacy, digital accessibility, inclusive hiring, career development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review