Cited by 24Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Decisions about referrals for psychological therapies: a matched-patient qualitative study

Open access
Stavrou, Stavros, Cape, John, Barker, Chris·2009·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological therapies are effective treatments for common mental health problems, but access is limited. GPs face difficult decisions as to whom to refer, but little is known about this decision-making process. AIM: To explore GPs' accounts of decisions to refer, or not refer, patients for psychological therapy. DESIGN OF STUDY: A qualitative study, using a matched-patient procedure. SETTING: General practices in two inner London boroughs. METHOD: In semi-structured interviews, GPs were asked to compare and contrast five matched-patient pairs, consisting of patients who had been referred for psychological therapy paired with patients not referred. The interviews were analysed using a general thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen GPs discussed 130 matched patients (65 patient pairs). Three main factors distinguished GPs' accounts of the patients they referred compared with the matched patients they did not refer. These factors were: patient initiative in requesting or showing interest in referral; estimated capacity of the patient to benefit from psychological therapy; and the GP's own capacity to help the patient in terms of skills, expertise, and time. CONCLUSION: GPs gave accounts of themselves acting as rational decision makers, judging how effective they thought a referral would be based on a patient's clinical presentation and motivation, compared with the GPs' own ability to help.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp09x454089

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hollinghurst S, Kessler D, Peters TJ, Gunnell D. Opportunity cost of antidepressant prescribing in England: analysis of routine data. BMJ 2005; 303: 999-1000.
  2. Olfson M, Marcuss S, Druss B, et al. National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression. JAMA 2002; 287: 203-209.
  3. Stavrou S, Cape J, Barker C. Decisions about referrals for psychological therapies: a matched-patient qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2009; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X454089 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X454098 professional roles. J Ment Health 1999; 8(2): 187-194. · DOI
  4. Kendrick T, King F, Albertella L, et al. GP treatment decisions for patients with depression. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55(513): 280-286.
  5. Lawson R, Guite H. Psychological therapies for common mental illness: how effective and equitable is provision? Prim Care Ment Health 2005; 3(1): 5-12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stavrou, S., Cape, J., & Barker, C.
Affiliations
St Pancras Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Cape, John
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
59
Issue
566
Pages
e289-e298
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W1975049157
Cited by
24
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
referral decisions, psychotherapy, general practitioners, decision-making, access to mental health care, patient motivation, perceived treatment benefit, common mental disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Decision Making, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Professional Practice, Psychotherapy, Referral and Consultation, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review