Cited by 58Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Variation in referral and access to new psychological therapy services by age: an empirical quantitative study

Open access
Pettit, Sophie, Qureshi, Adam, Lee, William, Stirzaker, Alex, Gibson, Alex, Henley, William, Byng, Richard·2017·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

Background: Older people with common mental health problems (CMHPs) are known to have reduced rates of referral to psychological therapy. Aim: To assess referral rates to the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services, contact with a therapist, and clinical outcome by age. Design and setting: Empirical research study using patient episodes of care from South West of England IAPT services. Method: By analysing 82 513 episodes of care (2010–2011), referral rates and clinical improvement were compared with both total population and estimated prevalence in each age group using IAPT data. Probable recovery of those completing treatment was calculated for each group. Results: Estimated prevalence of CMHPs peaks in 45–49-year-olds (20.59% of population). The proportions of patients identified with CMHPs being referred peaks at 20–24 years (22.95%) and reduces with increase in age thereafter to 6.00% for 70–74-year-olds. Once referred, the proportion of those attending first treatment increases with age between 20 years (57.34%) and 64 years (76.97%). In addition, the percentage of those having a clinical improvement gradually increases from the age of 18 years (12.94%) to 69 years (20.74%). Conclusion: Younger adults are more readily referred to IAPT services. However, as a proportion of those referred, probabilities of attending once, attending more than once, and clinical improvement increase with age. It is uncertain whether optimum levels of referral have been reached for young adults. It is important to establish whether changes to service configuration, treatment options, and GP behaviour can increase referrals for middle-aged and older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp17x691361

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pettit, S., Qureshi, A., Lee, W., Stirzaker, A., Gibson, A., Henley, W., & Byng, R.
Affiliations
  • University of West London (GB)
  • Edge Hill University (GB)
  • Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry (GB)
  • Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2017-06-05
Volume
67
Issue
660
Pages
e453-e459
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2621832144
Cited by
57
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWL Repository (University of West London) (acceptedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University (submittedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, age differences, older adults, common mental disorders, treatment attendance, clinical outcomes, young adults, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Mental Disorders, England, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Referral and Consultation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Age Distribution, Empirical Research, Healthcare Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review