The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
PHQ-9: sensitivity to change over time
Open accessAbstract
Professor Iliffe wonderfully caricatures the four flattering tailors who would weave the magic suit of clothes to bedeck the Emperor.'But look' says he, and professor Manthorpe, and doctors Vahabzadeh, Abbas, and Boyle say 'aye'.This is an important but well-recognised variant of the human condition, don't make it more than that.Enfold it as such among people at home and in their care homes and help these individuals live their lives as fully as possiblespecialist skills welded within primary care can play a useful, humble part in this.The Gnosall model has recently been visited by Professor Burns in full Tsar regalia.Shrewd Scot that he is, he knows true value when he sees it.This may be a further step toward wide adoption, the approach that offers better care for people with dementia, their families, and people who devote their working lives to their support.Its economics may just save the NHS from administration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Herrmann, C. (1997) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00216-4 · Cited by 2,885
Psychometric comparison of PHQ-9 and HADS for measuring depression severity in primary care
Cameron, I. M., Crawford, J. R., Lawton, K., & Reid, I. C. (2008) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp08x263794 · Cited by 590
Self-citationComparison of two self-rating scales to detect depression: HADS and PHQ-9
Hansson, M., Chotai, J., Nordstöm, A., & Bodlund, O. (2009) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp09x454070 · Cited by 246
Dowrick, C., Leydon, G. M., McBride, A., Howe, A., Burgess, H., Clarke, P., Maisey, S., & Kendrick, T. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b663 · Cited by 213
Identification of depression in diabetes: the efficacy of PHQ-9 and HADS-D
Reddy, P., Philpot, B., Ford, D., & Dunbar, J. A. (2010) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp10x502128 · Cited by 90
Concordance between PHQ-9 scores and patients’ experiences of depression: a mixed methods study
Malpass, A., Shaw, A. R. G., Kessler, D. S., & Sharp, D. (2010) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp10x502119 · Cited by 62
General practice at the cutting edge of information technology, or failing to keep pace?
Delaney, B. C. (2010) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp10x483869 · Cited by 6
Dementia: the deception is broken; naked truth looks OK
Jolley, D. J., & Greaves, I. (2010) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp10x514882
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Depression and Internet Use among Older Adolescents: An Experience Sampling Approach
Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L. A., Koff, R. N., & Eickhoff, J. C. (2012) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2012.329112 · Cited by 48
Li, J., Riedel, N., Barrech, A., Herr, R. M., Aust, B., Mörtl, K., Siegrist, J., Gündel, H., & Angerer, P. (2017) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/2853813 · Cited by 39
Fogliati, V. J., Terides, M. D., Gandy, M., Staples, L., Johnston, L., Karin, E., Rapee, R. M., Titov, N., & Dear, B. F. (2016) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2016.1158206 · Cited by 27
Williams, R. T., Heinemann, A. W., Neumann, H. D., Fann, J. R., Forchheimer, M. B., Richardson, E. J., & Bombardier, C. H. (2016) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.017 · Cited by 21
Nam, S., Tin, D., Bain, L., Thorne, C., & Ginsburg, L. R. (2013) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-013-2377-1 · Cited by 14
Bogosian, A., Hurt, C. S., Vasconcelos e Sa, D., Hindle, J. V., McCracken, L., & Cubi-Molla, P. (2017) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0117-4 · Cited by 12
Non-Adherence Tree Analysis (NATA)—An adherence improvement framework: A COVID-19 case study
Edifor, E. E., Brown, R., Smith, P., & Kossik, R. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247109 · Cited by 3
Wang, F., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., & Li, X. (2024) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.12.019 · Cited by 1
Silman, D., Middag, M. E., Cleare, A. J., Young, A. H., & Strawbridge, R. (2025) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2025.10932
Nguyen, B. T., Li, Y.-C., Dang, H. N., Nguyen, H. T., Thai, N. T. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, Q. T., Nguyen, D. T. K., Le, H. T. N., Nguyen, V. N. B., et al. (2026) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2025-003754
Metadata
- Authors
- Cameron, I. M., Reid, I. C., & Lawton, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Venue
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2010-07-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 576
- Pages
- 535.2-536
- ISSN
- 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-5242
- PMC
- PMC2894391
- OpenAlex
- W2168719137
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- PHQ-9, depression screening, sensitivity to change, primary care, dementia care
- MeSH terms
- Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
