Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Demand management defines any method used to monitor, direct, or regulate patient referrals. Strategies have been developed to manage the referral of patients to secondary care, with interventions that target primary care, specialist services, or infrastructure. AIM: To review the international evidence on interventions to manage referral from primary to specialist care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review. METHOD: Iterative, systematic searches of published and unpublished sources public health, health management, management, and grey literature databases from health care and other industries were undertaken to identify recent, relevant studies. A narrative synthesis of the data was completed to structure the evidence into groups of similar interventions. RESULTS: The searches generated 8327 unique results, of which 140 studies were included. Interventions were grouped into four intervention categories: GP education (n = 50); process change (n = 49); system change (n = 38); and patient-focused (n = 3). It is clear that there is no 'magic bullet' to managing demand for secondary care services: although some groups of interventions may have greater potential for development, given the existing evidence that they can be effective in specific contexts. CONCLUSIONS: To tackle demand management of primary care services, the focus cannot be on primary care alone; a whole-systems approach is needed because the introduction of interventions in primary care is often just the starting point of the referral process. In addition, more research is needed to develop and evaluate interventions that acknowledge the role of the patient in the referral decision.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interventions aimed at changing the process of care were found to be most effective in a systematic review investigating interventions affecting the nexus between primary and specialist care.
“In a systematic review investigating interventions affecting the nexus between primary and specialist care, interventions aimed at changing the process of care were found to be most effective.10”
From Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
Specialist consultation before referral and electronic referrals demonstrated the strongest positive effects among process-of-care interventions.
“Within this category, two types of interventions—specialist consultation before referral and electronic referrals—demonstrated the strongest positive effects.10”
From Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Eccles, M., Steen, N., Grimshaw, J., Thomas, L., McNamee, P., Soutter, J., Wilsdon, J., Matowe, L., Needham, G., Gilbert, F., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04564-5 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Robling, M. R., Houston, H. L. A., Kinnersley, P., Hourihan, M. D., Cohen, D. R., Hale, J., & Hood, K. (2002) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1053/crad.2001.0864 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Trial of low-cost teledermatology in primary care
Hockey, A. D., Wootton, R., & Casey, T. (2004) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/1357633042614221 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Osman, M. A., Schick-Makaroff, K., Thompson, S., Bialy, L., Featherstone, R., Kurzawa, J., Zaidi, D., Okpechi, I., Habib, S., Shojai, S., et al. (2019) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001629 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“Within this category, two types of interventions— specialist consultation before referral and electronic referrals—demonstrated the strongest positive effects.(10) Electronic consultation (eConsult) is defined as a provider-to-provider asynchronous exchange of patient information using a secure electronic platform.”
Rutherford, M., Forsyth, K., McKenzie, K., McClure, I., Murray, A., McCartney, D., Irvine, L., & O’Hare, A. (2018) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3501-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blank, L., Baxter, S., Woods, H. B., Goyder, E., Lee, A., Payne, N., & Rimmer, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 629
- Pages
- e765-e774
- ISSN
- 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-5242
- PMC
- PMC4240149
- OpenAlex
- W2155241186
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Washington
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (11/1022/01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
- Keywords
- demand management, referral, primary care, secondary care, specialist care, general practice training, process change, system change, whole systems approach, health care demand
- MeSH terms
- United Kingdom, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Secondary Care, Secondary Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review