Cited by 64Healthcare Systems and TechnologyPrimary Care and Health OutcomesHealth Services Management and Policy

Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence

Open access
Blank, Lindsay, Baxter, Susan, Woods, Helen Buckley, Goyder, Elizabeth, Lee, Andrew, Payne, Nick, Rimmer, Melanie·2014·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Demand management defines any method used to monitor, direct, or regulate patient referrals. Strategies have been developed to manage the referral of patients to secondary care, with interventions that target primary care, specialist services, or infrastructure. AIM: To review the international evidence on interventions to manage referral from primary to specialist care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review. METHOD: Iterative, systematic searches of published and unpublished sources public health, health management, management, and grey literature databases from health care and other industries were undertaken to identify recent, relevant studies. A narrative synthesis of the data was completed to structure the evidence into groups of similar interventions. RESULTS: The searches generated 8327 unique results, of which 140 studies were included. Interventions were grouped into four intervention categories: GP education (n = 50); process change (n = 49); system change (n = 38); and patient-focused (n = 3). It is clear that there is no 'magic bullet' to managing demand for secondary care services: although some groups of interventions may have greater potential for development, given the existing evidence that they can be effective in specific contexts. CONCLUSIONS: To tackle demand management of primary care services, the focus cannot be on primary care alone; a whole-systems approach is needed because the introduction of interventions in primary care is often just the starting point of the referral process. In addition, more research is needed to develop and evaluate interventions that acknowledge the role of the patient in the referral decision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp14x682837

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blank, L., Baxter, S., Woods, H. B., Goyder, E., Lee, A., Payne, N., & Rimmer, M.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2014-12
Volume
64
Issue
629
Pages
e765-e774
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2155241186
Cited by
64
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (11/1022/01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
demand management, referral, primary care, secondary care, specialist care, general practice training, process change, system change, whole systems approach, health care demand
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Secondary Care, Secondary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review