Cited by 32Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyDigital Imaging in Medicine

Trial of low-cost teledermatology in primary care

Hockey, A D, Wootton, R, Casey, T·2004·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We examined the feasibility of a low-cost, store-and-forward teledermatology service for general practitioners (GPs) in regional Queensland. Digital pictures and a brief case history were transmitted by email. A service coordinator carried out quality control checks and then forwarded these email messages to a consultant dermatologist. On receiving a clinical response from the dermatologist, the service coordinator returned the message to the referring GP. The aim was to provide advice to rural GPs within one working day. Over six months, 63 referrals were processed by the teledermatology service, covering a wide range of dermatological conditions. In the majority of cases the referring doctors were able to treat the condition after receipt of email advice from the dermatologist; however, in 10 cases (16%) additional images or biopsy results were requested because image quality was inadequate. The average time between a referral being received and clinical advice being provided to the referring GPs was 46 hours. The number of referrals in the present study, 1.05 per month per site, was similar to that reported in other primary care studies. While the use of low-cost digital cameras and public email is feasible, there may be other issues, for example remuneration, which will militate against the widespread introduction of primary care teledermatology in Australia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/1357633042614221

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hockey, A. D., Wootton, R., & Casey, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Department of Dermatology, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
Corresponding author
Hockey, A D
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2004-11
Volume
10
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
44-47
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W1991813753
Cited by
32
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
Keywords
teledermatology, store-and-forward telemedicine, primary care, general practitioners, rural primary care, dermatology referral, email communication, digital images, service feasibility, dermatology consultation
MeSH terms
Dermatology, Family Practice, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Primary Health Care, Queensland, Referral and Consultation, Skin Diseases, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review