Is this really doctoring?
Open accessAbstract
Is this really
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Remote consulting makes the personal care afforded by the extended, face-to-face "long consultation" more difficult.
“Our findings affirmed published claims that remote consulting is cognitively burdensome (54), excludes the physical touch on which the therapeutic relationship has traditionally depended (55), threatens continuity of care (7), brings greater clinical uncertainty, and makes the personal care afforded by the extended, face-to-face “long consultation” more difficult (8, 56, 57).”
From Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels.
Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R. (1967) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0024648 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Houellebecq, M. (2005) · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greenhalgh, T., Rosen, R., Shaw, S. E., Byng, R., Faulkner, S., Finlay, T., Grundy, E., Husain, L., Hughes, G., Leone, C., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2021.726095 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“Our findings affirmed published claims that remote consulting is cognitively burdensome (54), excludes the physical touch on which the therapeutic relationship has traditionally depended (55), threatens continuity of care (7), brings greater clinical uncertainty, and makes the personal care afforded by the extended, f…”
BackgroundProtocol: Remote care as the ‘new normal’? Multi-site case study in UK general practice
Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S. E., Nishio, A. A., Booth, A., Byng, R., Clarke, A., Dakin, F., Davies, R., Faulkner, S. D., Hemmings, N., et al. (2022) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.13289.1 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Touch matters: COVID-19, physical examination, and 21st century general practice
de Zulueta, P. (2020) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp20x713705 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Granja, M., Correia, S., & Alves, L. (2023) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-023-01994-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kushnir, T., Sandhaus, Y., Castel, H., Golik, A., Salai, M., Tzabari, A., Yahav, Y., Grossman, Z., Mazuz, H., & Ashkenazi, S. (2023) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s410953 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S. E., Nishio, A. A., et al. (2022) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.14413.r28751
Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S. E., Nishio, A. A., et al. (2023) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.14413.r29094
Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S. E., Nishio, A. A., et al. (2023) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.14413.r29093
Granja, M., Correia, S., & Alves, L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26568301
- Authors
- Dawnay, G.
- Affiliations
- Wye Valley NHS Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dawnay, Giles
- Venue
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2020-08-27
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 698
- Pages
- 455-455
- ISSN
- 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-5242
- PMC
- PMC7449438
- OpenAlex
- W3081784441
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Terminology › Medical Research and Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
