Loneliness: an incommunicable disease?
Open accessAbstract
ATOMISATIONFor many people the experience of isolation did not begin with the current pandemic.Loneliness has long been a problem on both sides of the GP's desk, but with opposing consequences.Socially alienated patients are more likely to experience health problems, and a desire for companionship can motivate a visit to the GP. 1 Conversely, GPs who find themselves without professional support or collegiality have an increased chance of leaving the profession.2,3 The lonely patient is more likely to be in the surgery, and the isolated doctor less likely to be there.It is a poignant image: two contrapuntal lonelinesses, neither of which finds solace in the other.The problem of patients' social isolation has attracted attention from many quarters in recent years, with a ministerial appointment, a national campaign, and research from scholars of public health, neuroendocrinology, sociology, psychology, and history.The former surgeon general of the US states that combatting disconnection is the 'greatest challenge facing us today'.4 The health effects are still debated: loneliness is associated with, but perhaps not fully responsible for, cardiovascular and neurological morbidities, inflammatory dysregulation, and a contributor to early mortality.[5][6][7] Yet medicalisation can only take us so far in understanding isolation: biomedicine may be able to identify some of the physiological consequences, but it is unlikely to proffer any meaningful therapies for a condition that historians and sociologists have located, inter alia, as the result of increased affluence, 8 surging inequality, 9 and modernity's individualistic obsession with self-cultivation.10 This is a problem, like racial inequality or environmental pollution, that saturates the
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complex effects of the remote modality on front-line staff added to the huge pandemic-related toll on their morale and well-being.
“These complex effects of the remote modality on front-line staff added to the huge pandemic-related toll on their morale and well-being, which included the physical and emotional stress of clinical work, the personal risk of infection and its complications, and personal bereavements and other losses (59–61).”
From Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The neuroendocrinology of social isolation
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Capitanio, J. P., & Cole, S. W. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015240 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Going solo: the extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-7198 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Hakulinen, C., Pulkki-Råback, L., Virtanen, M., Jokela, M., Kivimäki, M., & Elovainio, M. (2018) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312663 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions
Donne, J. (1624) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00006058 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Held, V. (2005) · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Lost to the NHS: a mixed methods study of why GPs leave practice early in England
Doran, N., Fox, F. E., Rodham, K., Taylor, G. T., & Harris, M. (2016) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp16x683425 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Someone to talk to? The role of loneliness as a factor in the frequency of GP consultations.
Ellaway, A., Wood, S., & MacIntyre, S. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Held, V. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.003.0020 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Occupational isolation among general practitioners in Finland
Aira, M., Mäntyselkä, P. T., Vehviläinen, A. T., et al. (2010) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqq082 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Geographic Characteristics of Loneliness in Primary Care
Tong, S. T., Mullen, R. A., Hochheimer, C. J., Sabo, R., Liaw, W. R., Nease, D. E., Krist, A. H., & Frey, J. (2019) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2364 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Unravelling the associations between social isolation, loneliness, and mortality
Liu, B. C., & Floud, S. (2017) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30090-7 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Winnicott, D. W. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780190271374.003.0060 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Alberti, F. B. (2019) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greenhalgh, T., Rosen, R., Shaw, S. E., Byng, R., Faulkner, S., Finlay, T., Grundy, E., Husain, L., Hughes, G., Leone, C., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2021.726095 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“…effects of the remote modality on front-line staff added to the huge pandemic-related toll on their morale and well-being, which included the physical and emotional stress of clinical work, the personal risk of infection and its complications, and personal bereavements and other losses (59–61).”
Background
- Authors
- Franklin, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Franklin, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Franklin, Jonathan
- Venue
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2020-08-27
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 698
- Pages
- 463-463
- ISSN
- 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-5242
- PMC
- PMC7449449
- OpenAlex
- W3082445449
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Keywords
- loneliness, social isolation, general practice, general practitioners, medicalization, cardiovascular disease, mortality, social determinants of health, inequality, individualism
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Loneliness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review