Cited by 355Health disparities and outcomesCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for myocardial infarction, stroke and mortality: UK Biobank cohort study of 479 054 men and women

Open access
Hakulinen, Christian, Pulkki-Råback, Laura, Virtanen, Marianna, Jokela, Markus, Kivimäki, Mika, Elovainio, Marko·2018·Heart

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether social isolation and loneliness (1) predict acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke among those with no history of AMI or stroke, (2) are related to mortality risk among those with a history of AMI or stroke, and (3) the extent to which these associations are explained by known risk factors or pre-existing chronic conditions. Methods: Participants were 479 054 individuals from the UK Biobank. The exposures were self-reported social isolation and loneliness. AMI, stroke and mortality were the outcomes. Results: Over 7.1 years, 5731 had first AMI, and 3471 had first stroke. In model adjusted for demographics, social isolation was associated with higher risk of AMI (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.3 to –1.55) and stroke (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.54). When adjusted for all the other risk factors, the HR for AMI was attenuated by 84% to 1.07 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.16) and the HR for stroke was attenuated by 83% to 1.06 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.19). Loneliness was associated with higher risk of AMI before (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.64) but attenuated considerably with adjustments (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.17). This was also the case for stroke (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.55 before and HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.19 after adjustments). Social isolation, but not loneliness, was associated with increased mortality in participants with a history of AMI (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.51) or stroke (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.61) in the fully adjusted model. Conclusions: Isolated and lonely persons are at increased risk of AMI and stroke, and, among those with a history of AMI or stroke, increased risk of death. Most of this risk was explained by conventional risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312663

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In over 450,000 UK Biobank participants, neither isolation nor loneliness predicted a first heart attack, but isolation did predict death among those with prior cardiovascular disease or stroke.

    “For example, an analysis of more than 450,000 participants in the UK Biobank tested associations between social isolation, loneliness, and acute myocardial infarction (MI). Neither factor was associated with first MI, but social isolation predicted mortality among people with a history of cardiovascular disease or stroke [29].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hakulinen, C., Pulkki-Råback, L., Virtanen, M., Jokela, M., Kivimäki, M., & Elovainio, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
Corresponding author
Hakulinen, Christian
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-03-27
Volume
104
Issue
18
Pages
1536-1542
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2795121900
Cited by
355
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 8
FWCI
29.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • WOS
Funders
  • NordForsk
  • Suomen Akatemia
  • Helsinki Institute of Life Science fellowship
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
social isolation, loneliness, myocardial infarction, stroke, mortality, cardiovascular risk factors, social determinants of health, UK Biobank, men and women comparison, post-stroke mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Social Isolation, Time Factors, Incidence, Survival Rate, Risk Assessment, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review