Defining when specialised mental health care is needed: a focus group study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Shared understanding between GPs and hospital specialists concerning when patients need specialised mental health care is important to ensure patients receive appropriate care. The large amount of rejected referrals often indicates a lack of such shared understanding. Aim: To explore how patient representatives, GPs, and mental health specialists understand ‘need for specialised mental health care’, meaning that primary care is no longer sufficient. Design & setting: This qualitative study was conducted in western Norway. The study has a service user-involved research design in which GPs and patient representatives participated in all stages of the research process. Method: Six semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted. The groups were homogenous as they included only the perspectives of either GPs, mental health specialists, or patient representatives. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The need for specialised mental health care was assessed using two continuums: (a) the patient’s level of functioning and symptoms; and (b) characteristics of the healthcare system and the patient’s informal support networks. Assessment along these continuums were often overruled by the evaluation of expected usefulness of specialised mental health care. In addition, all participants reported they often adapted their definition of need to fit other stakeholders’ interpretations of need. Conclusion: Evaluation of need for specialised mental health care is complex and depends on several factors. This may explain some of the current challenges that exist with regard to equity and timely access to appropriate healthcare interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In today's triage process, there is often no common understanding between the referrer and the hospital specialist regarding the necessity of more specialised treatment.
“Another weakness observed in today’s triage process is that there is often no common understanding between the referrer and the hospital specialist regarding the necessity of more specialised treatment [18]”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · Cited by 42,509 · see citing works
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (1980) · Cited by 35,637 · see citing works
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000388 · Cited by 12,211 · see citing works
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560 · see citing works
Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E. T., & Chadwick, B. L. (2008) · BDJ · doi:10.1038/bdj.2008.192 · Cited by 2,779 · see citing works
Kripalani, S., LeFevre, F., Phillips, C. O., Williams, M. V., Basaviah, P., & Baker, D. W. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.8.831 · Cited by 2,103 · see citing works
International profiles of health care systems, 2012
Jun, M., Squires, D. A., Osborn, R., & Thomson, S. (2012) · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care
Akbari, A., Mayhew, A., Al-Alawi, M. A., Grimshaw, J., Winkens, R. A. G., Glidewell, L., Pritchard, C., Thomas, R. E., & Fraser, C. M. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005471.pub2 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Sampling: how to select participants in my research study?
Martínez-Mesa, J., González‐Chica, D. A., Duquia, R. P., Bonamigo, R. R., & Bastos, J. L. (2016) · Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia · doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20165254 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory
Ryan, G. S. (2018) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.2018.e1466 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Effective handover communication: An overview of research and improvement efforts
Manser, T., & Foster, S. (2011) · Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2011.02.006 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
From ‘other’ to involved: user involvement in research: an emerging paradigm
Beresford, P. (2013) · Nordic Social Work Research · doi:10.1080/2156857x.2013.835138 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Improving measurement in clinical handover
Jeffcott, S. A., Evans, S., Cameron, P. A., Chin, G. S. M., & Ibrahim, J. (2009) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.024570 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Recovery: Past progress and future challenges
Slade, M., Adams, N. H., & O’Hagan, M. (2012) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261.2011.644847 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Assessing the quality of patient handoffs at care transitions
Manser, T., Foster, S., Gisin, S., Jaeckel, D., & Ummenhofer, W. C. (2010) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.038430 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Understanding Mental Health Treatment in Persons Without Mental Diagnoses
Druss, B. G., Wang, P. S., Sampson, N. A., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Wells, K. B., & Kessler, R. C. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1196 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Pincus, H. A., Page, A., Druss, B. G., Appelbaum, P. S., Gottlieb, G. L., & England, M. J. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.712 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Younès, N., Gasquet, I., Gaudebout, P., Chaillet, M. P., Kovess–Masféty, V., Falissard, B., & Hardy-Baylé, M. C. (2005) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-6-18 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Frost, R., Beattie, A., Bhanu, C., Walters, K. R., & Ben‐Shlomo, Y. (2019) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp19x701297 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Pettit, S., Qureshi, A., Lee, W., Stirzaker, A., Gibson, A., Henley, W., & Byng, R. (2017) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp17x691361 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Philibert, I., & Barach, P. R. (2012) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001598 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
General practitioners’ reflections on referring: An asymmetric or non-dialogical process?
Thorsen, O., Hartveit, M., & Bærheim, A. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.3109/02813432.2012.711190 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationPincus, H. A. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.164.5.712 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
SHAW, I. F., Smith, K., Middleton, H. C., & Woodward, L. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304270725 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Thorsen, O., Hartveit, M., & Bærheim, A. (2013) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-14-153 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationHolman, P. A., Ruud, T., & Grepperud, S. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-162 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Muche‐Borowski, C., Abiry, D., Wagner, H.-O., Barzel, A., Lühmann, D., Egidi, G., Kühlein, T., & Scherer, M. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3569-9 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Grepperud, S., Holman, P. A., & Wangen, K. R. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0620-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [36]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Common mental health problems: identification and pathways to care. Clinical guideline [CG123] 2011 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg123/chapter/1-Guidance 28 Nov 2019 31851443
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kvestad, C. A., Holte, I. R., Reitan, S. K., Chiappa, C. S., Helle, G. K., Skjervold, A. E., Rosenlund, A. M. A., Watne, Ø., Brattland, H., Helle, J., et al. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08028-6 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Another weakness observed in today’s triage process is that there is often no common understanding between the referrer and the hospital specialist regarding the necessity of more specialised treatment [18].”
Background
- Authors
- Nymoen, M., Biringer, E., Helgeland, J., Hellesen, H. B., Alsaker Sande, L., & Hartveit, M.
- Affiliations
- Fonna Hospital Trust (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Nymoen, Marit
- Venue
- BJGP Open
- Published
- 2020-01-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- bjgpopen20X101004
- ISSN
- 2398-3795 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7330180
- OpenAlex
- W2999626723
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BJGP Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Keywords
- needs assessment, referral decisions, primary care, mental health professionals, general practitioners, patient representatives, service user involvement, informal support networks, healthcare access equity, stakeholder perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
