Cited by 110Global Health and SurgeryHealth and Medical Research ImpactsHealth and Medical Education

Building capacity for public and population health research in Africa: the consortium for advanced research training in Africa (CARTA) model

Open access
Ezeh, Alex C., Izugbara, Chimaraoke O., Kabiru, Caroline W., Fonn, Sharon, Kahn, Kathleen, Manderson, Lenore, Undieh, Ashiwel S., Omigbodun, Akinyinka +1 more·2010·Global Health Action

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, sub-Saharan Africa bears the greatest burden of disease. Strengthened research capacity to understand the social determinants of health among different African populations is key to addressing the drivers of poor health and developing interventions to improve health outcomes and health systems in the region. Yet, the continent clearly lacks centers of research excellence that can generate a strong evidence base to address the region's socio-economic and health problems. OBJECTIVE AND PROGRAM OVERVIEW: We describe the recently launched Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA), which brings together a network of nine academic and four research institutions from West, East, Central, and Southern Africa, and select northern universities and training institutes. CARTA's program of activities comprises two primary, interrelated, and mutually reinforcing objectives: to strengthen research infrastructure and capacity at African universities; and to support doctoral training through the creation of a collaborative doctoral training program in population and public health. The ultimate goal of CARTA is to build local research capacity to understand the determinants of population health and effectively intervene to improve health outcomes and health systems. CONCLUSIONS: CARTA's focus on the local production of networked and high-skilled researchers committed to working in sub-Saharan Africa, and on the concomitant increase in local research and training capacity of African universities and research institutes addresses the inability of existing programs to create a critical mass of well-trained and networked researchers across the continent. The initiative's goal of strengthening human resources and university-wide systems critical to the success and sustainability of research productivity in public and population health will rejuvenate institutional teaching, research, and administrative systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/gha.v3i0.5693

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Academia is a key stakeholder as the research and evidence-based policy development pipeline are synergistic.

    “Academia is a key stakeholder as the research and evidence-based policy development pipeline are synergistic.15,16”

    From Oral Health Policy and Research Capacity: Perspectives From Dental Schools in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Conclusion (page not provided) describes African universities as central to building research capacity and says CARTA’s engagement with policymakers should improve the relevance and use-value of research. This supports academia’s role in connecting research with policy, but the paper does not establish the broader claim that research and evidence-based policy development are synergistic. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ezeh, A. C., Izugbara, C. O., Kabiru, C. W., Fonn, S., Kahn, K., Manderson, L., Undieh, A. S., Omigbodun, A., & Thorogood, M.
Affiliations
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
Corresponding author
Ezeh, Alex C.
Venue
Global Health Action
Published
2010-11-12
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1654-9716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-9880
OpenAlex
W2102744119
Cited by
110
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Health Action (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (087547/Z/08/Z, 087547)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
research capacity building, public health research, population health research, doctoral education, research infrastructure, African universities, social determinants of health, research networks, sub-Saharan Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review