The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of disparate isolation methods for extracellular vesicles on downstream RNA profiling
Open accessAbstract
Despite an enormous interest in the role of extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, in cancer and their use as biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, drug response and recurrence, there is no consensus on dependable isolation protocols. We provide a comparative evaluation of 4 exosome isolation protocols for their usability, yield and purity, and their impact on downstream omics approaches for biomarker discovery. OptiPrep density gradient centrifugation outperforms ultracentrifugation and ExoQuick and Total Exosome Isolation precipitation in terms of purity, as illustrated by the highest number of CD63‐positive nanovesicles, the highest enrichment in exosomal marker proteins and a lack of contaminating proteins such as extracellular Argonaute‐2 complexes. The purest exosome fractions reveal a unique mRNA profile enriched for translation, ribosome, mitochondrion and nuclear lumen function. Our results demonstrate that implementation of high purification techniques is a prerequisite to obtain reliable omics data and identify exosome‐specific functions and biomarkers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · Cited by 35,890
Valadi, H., Ekström, K., Bossios, A., Sjöstrand, M., Lee, J. J., & Lötvall, J. O. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1596 · Cited by 12,834
Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J. C., Creasy, D. M., & Cottrell, J. S. (1999) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::aid-elps3551>3.0.co;2-2 · Cited by 8,203
Isolation and Characterization of Exosomes from Cell Culture Supernatants and Biological Fluids
Théry, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G., & Clayton, A. (2006) · Current Protocols in Cell Biology · doi:10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30 · Cited by 5,766
Arroyo, J. D., Chevillet, J. R., Kroh, E. M., Ruf, I. K., Pritchard, C. C., Gibson, D. F., Mitchell, P. S., Bennett, C. F., Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E. L., Stirewalt, D. L., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019055108 · Cited by 3,294
Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway
Ostrowski, M., Carmo, N. B., Krumeich, S., Fanget, I., Raposo, G., Savina, A., Moita, C. F., Schauer, K., Hume, A. N., Freitas, R. P., et al. (2010) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2000 · Cited by 2,750
Witwer, K. W., Buzás, E. I., Bemis, L. T., Bora, A., Lässer, C., Lötvall, J., Nolte‐‘t Hoen, E. N., Piper, M. G., Sivaraman, S., Skog, J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v2i0.20360 · Cited by 2,421
Exosomes – vesicular carriers for intercellular communication
Simons, M., & Raposo, G. (2009) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2009.03.007 · Cited by 2,351
Characterization of extracellular circulating microRNA
Turchinovich, A., Weiz, L., Langheinz, A., & Burwinkel, B. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr254 · Cited by 1,941
Cited by
Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Aikawa, E., Alcaraz, M. J., Anderson, J. D., Andriantsitohaina, R., Antoniou, A., Arab, T., Archer, F., Atkin‐Smith, G. K., et al. (2018) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 · Cited by 11,099
Self-citationCommunication by Extracellular Vesicles: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go
Tkach, M., & Théry, C. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.043 · Cited by 3,444
Lötvall, J., Hill, A. F., Hochberg, F., Buzás, E. I., Di Vizio, D., Gardiner, C., Gho, Y. S., Kurochkin, I. V., Mathivanan, S., Quesenberry, P., et al. (2014) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v3.26913 · Cited by 2,451
Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release
Hessvik, N. P., & Llorente, A. (2018) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2595-9 · Cited by 2,362
RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications
O’Brien, K., Breyne, K., Ughetto, S., Laurent, L. C., & Breakefield, X. O. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0251-y · Cited by 1,811
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Deun, J., Mestdagh, P., Sormunen, R., Cocquyt, V., Vermaelen, K., Vandesompele, J., Bracke, M., De Wever, O., & Hendrix, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169894204
- Cited by
- 938
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 21.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of disparate isolation methods for extracellular vesicles on downstream RNA profiling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/jev.v3.24858
- The paper
- Van Deun, J., Mestdagh, P., Sormunen, R., Cocquyt, V., Vermaelen, K., Vandesompele, J., Bracke, M., De Wever, O., & Hendrix, A. (2014). The impact of disparate isolation methods for extracellular vesicles on downstream RNA profiling. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.24858
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
