The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: results of a worldwide survey
Open accessAbstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) represent an important mode of intercellular communication. Research in this field has grown rapidly in the last few years, and there is a plethora of techniques for the isolation and characterization of EVs, many of which are poorly standardized. EVs are heterogeneous in size, origin and molecular constituents, with considerable overlap in size and phenotype between different populations of EVs. Little is known about current practices for the isolation, purification and characterization of EVs. We report here the first large, detailed survey of current worldwide practices for the isolation and characterization of EVs. Conditioned cell culture media was the most widely used material (83%). Ultracentrifugation remains the most commonly used isolation method (81%) with 59% of respondents use a combination of methods. Only 9% of respondents used only 1 characterization method, with others using 2 or more methods. Sample volume, sample type and downstream application all influenced the isolation and characterization techniques employed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends
Raposo, G., & Stoorvogel, W. (2013) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201211138 · Cited by 8,099
Webber, J., & Clayton, A. (2013) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v2i0.19861 · Cited by 817
Cited by
Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Aikawa, E., Alcaraz, M. J., Anderson, J. D., Andriantsitohaina, R., Antoniou, A., Arab, T., Archer, F., Atkin‐Smith, G. K., et al. (2018) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 · Cited by 11,099
Self-citationWelsh, J. A., Goberdhan, D. C. I., O'Driscoll, L., Buzas, E. I., Blenkiron, C., Bussolati, B., Cai, H., Di Vizio, D., Driedonks, T. A. P., Erdbrügger, U., et al. (2024) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12404 · Cited by 4,663
Self-citationAdvances in therapeutic applications of extracellular vesicles
Wiklander, O. P. B., Brennan, M. Á., Lötvall, J., Breakefield, X. O., & EL Andaloussi, S. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8521 · Cited by 1,039
Exosomes as a new frontier of cancer liquid biopsy
Yu, D., Li, Y., Wang, M., Gu, J., Xu, W., Cai, H., Fang, X., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-022-01509-9 · Cited by 855
Exosomes: Large-scale production, isolation, drug loading efficiency, and biodistribution and uptake
Kimiz-Gebologlu, I., & Oncel, S. S. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.027 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardiner, C., Di Vizio, D., Sahoo, S., Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Wauben, M., & Hill, A. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32945-32945
- ISSN
- 2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2540034041
- Cited by
- 1,069
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: results of a worldwide survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/jev.v5.32945
- The paper
- Gardiner, C., Di Vizio, D., Sahoo, S., Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Wauben, M., & Hill, A. F. (2016). Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: results of a worldwide survey. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v5.32945
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
