Cited by 817Extracellular vesicles in diseaseNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

How pure are your vesicles?

Open access
Webber, Jason, Clayton, Aled·2013·Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract

We propose a straightforward method to estimate the purity of vesicle preparations by comparing the ratio of nano-vesicle counts to protein concentration, using tools such as the increasingly available NanoSight platform and a colorimetric protein assay such as the BCA-assay. Such an approach is simple enough to apply to every vesicle preparation within a given laboratory, assisting researchers as a routine quality control step. Also, the approach may aid in comparing/standardising vesicle purity across diverse studies, and may be of particular importance in evaluating vesicular biomarkers. We herein propose some criteria to aid in the definition of pure vesicles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/jev.v2i0.19861

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The particle-to-protein ratio has been proposed as an indicator for estimating the purity of EV preparations, although its applicability requires careful evaluation since expected ratios can vary depending on factors such as EV origin and isolation method.

    “The particle-to-protein ratio has been proposed as an indicator for estimating the purity of EV preparations [60], although its applicability requires careful evaluation [49,50], since expected ratios can vary depending on multiple factors, such as EV origin and isolation method.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [1]Duijvesz D Luider T Bangma CH Jenster G Exosomes as biomarker treasure chests for prostate cancer Eur Urol 2011 59 823 31 21196075
  2. [2]Peinado H Aleckovic M Lavotshkin S Matei I Costa-Silva B Moreno-Bueno G Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET Nat Med 2012 18 883 91 22635005 PMC3645291
  3. [3]Alvarez-Erviti L Seow Y Yin H Betts C Lakhal S Wood MJ Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes Nat Biotechnol 2011 29 341 5 21423189
  4. [5]Papp K Vegh P Prechl J Kerekes K Kovacs J Csikos G B lymphocytes and macrophages release cell membrane deposited C3-fragments on exosomes with T cell response-enhancing capacity Mol Immunol 2008 45 2343 51 18192019
  5. [6]Ramirez-Alvarado M Ward CJ Huang BQ Gong X Hogan MC Madden BJ Differences in immunoglobulin light chain species found in urinary exosomes in light chain amyloidosis (Al) PLoS One 2012 7 e38061 22723846 PMC3377641
  6. [7]Mitchell JP Court J Mason MD Tabi Z Clayton A Increased exosome production from tumour cell cultures using the Integra CELLine Culture System J Immunol Methods 2008 335 98 105 18423480
  7. [8]Welton JL Khanna S Giles PJ Brennan P Brewis IA Staffurth J Proteomics analysis of bladder cancer exosomes Mol Cell Proteomics 2010 9 1324 38 20224111 PMC2877990
  8. [9]Dragovic RA Gardiner C Brooks AS Tannetta DS Ferguson DJ Hole P Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using nanoparticle tracking analysis Nanomedicine 2011 7 780 8 21601655 PMC3280380
  9. [10]Clayton A Mitchell JP Court J Mason MD Tabi Z Human tumor-derived exosomes selectively impair lymphocyte responses to interleukin-2 Cancer Res 2007 67 7458 66 17671216
  10. [11]Mitchell PJ Welton J Staffurth J Court J Mason MD Tabi Z Can urinary exosomes act as treatment response markers in prostate cancer? J Transl Med 2009 7 4 19138409 PMC2631476
  11. [12]Pisitkun T Shen R Knepper M Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human urine Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 13369 73 PMC516573 15326289

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webber, J., & Clayton, A.
Affiliations
Velindre Cancer Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Clayton, Aled
Venue
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076637458
Cited by
817
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 3
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Extracellular Vesicles (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cronfa (Swansea University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Cancer Research Wales
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Keywords
extracellular vesicles, vesicle purity, nanoparticle tracking analysis, BCA assay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review