The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A synthesis inversion of the concentration and δ13C of atmospheric CO2
Abstract
A synthesis inversion technique is used to estimate CO2 fluxes to and from the atmosphere. Concentrations calculated by the GISS atmospheric tracer transport model are fitted to observations of CO2 and 13CO2. The procedure uses the uncertainty in the data to derive measures of uncertainty for the estimated sources, thus allowing a comparison of the relative importance of various data items in reducing these uncertainties. We analysed two periods. The first, 1986-1987, was intended to be representative of these and earlier years. The CO2 data appear generally representative but the inversion produces some features that may reflect El Niño conditions. The second period was 1989-1990 which had anomalous behaviour in δ3C. The attempt to analyse 1989-1990 was somewhat unsatisfactory, apparently because the assumption of a quasi-steady state, required by our analysis, was not satisfied sufficiently well. The main result is that global totals of oceanic versus biotic exchange are constrained primarily by the global trends of CO2 and 13CO2. The transport model constrains the regional sources and sinks but these constraints make only a small contribution to reducing the uncertainty in the global budget. We find that within the range of ≈ 1.2 Gt C y-1 our unconstrained estimates of air-sea flux are very sensitive to the choice of data that are fitted. This confirms the appropriateness of our formal error estimates based on a priori statistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990*
Houghton, R. A. (1999) · Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology · doi:10.3402/tellusb.v51i2.16288 · Cited by 852
The utility of remotely sensed CO2 concentration data in surface source inversions
Rayner, P. J., & O'Brien, D. M. (2001) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2000gl011912 · Cited by 441
High accuracy measurements of dry mole fractions of carbon dioxide and methane in humid air
Rella, C. W., Chen, H., Andrews, A. E., Filges, A., Gerbig, C., Hatakka, J., Karion, A., Miles, N. L., Richardson, S. J., Steinbacher, M., et al. (2013) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-6-837-2013 · Cited by 194
Schuh, A. E., Lauvaux, T., West, T. O., Denning, A. S., Davis, K. J., Miles, N., Richardson, S., Uliasz, M., Lokupitiya, E., Cooley, D., et al. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12141 · Cited by 85
Role of simulated GOSAT total column CO2 observations in surface CO2 flux uncertainty reduction
Kadygrov, N., Maksyutov, S., Eguchi, N., Aoki, T., Nakazawa, T., Yokota, T., & Inoue, G. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008jd011597 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Enting, I. G., Trudinger, C. M., & Francey, R. J.
- Venue
- Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology
- Publisher
- Stockholm University Press
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 35
- ISSN
- 0280-6509 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0889
- OpenAlex
- W2110019875
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A synthesis inversion of the concentration and δ13C of atmospheric CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/tellusb.v47i1-2.15998
- The paper
- Enting, I. G., Trudinger, C. M., & Francey, R. J. (1995). A synthesis inversion of the concentration and δ13C of atmospheric CO2. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v47i1-2.15998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.