Cited by 127Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in EpidemiologySpatial and Panel Data Analysis

Generalized Estimating Equations: Notes on the Choice of the Working Correlation Matrix

Vens, M., Ziegler, A.·2010·Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract

Summary: Background: Generalized estimating equations (GEE) are an extension of generalized linear models (GLM) in that they allow adjusting for correlations between observations. A major strength of GEE is that they do not require the correct specification of the multivariate distribution but only of the mean structure. Objectives: Several concerns have been raised about the validity of GEE when applied to dichotomous dependent variables. In this contribution, we summarize the theoretical findings concerning efficiency and validity of GEE. Methods: We introduce the GEE in a formal way, summarize general findings on the choice of the working correlation matrix, and show the existence of a dilemma for the optimal choice of the working correlation matrix for dichotomous dependent variables. Results: Biological and statistical arguments for choosing a specific working correlation matrix are given. Three approaches are described for overcoming the range restriction of the correlation coefficient. Conclusions: The three approaches described in this article for overcoming the range restrictions for dichotomous dependent variables in GEE models provide a simple and practical way for use in applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3414/me10-01-0026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the number of experimental units was small, the GEE1 sandwich estimator of the variance provided standard errors that were too small and therefore inflated the type 1 error rate.

    “When the number of experimental units was small, the GEE1 sandwich estimator of the variance provided standard errors that were too small and therefore inflated the type 1 error rate31,32.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vens, M., & Ziegler, A.
Affiliations
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
2010
Volume
49
Issue
05
Pages
421-425
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W4292366122
Cited by
127
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Methods of Information in Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
generalized estimating equations, working correlation matrix, dichotomous dependent variable, correlated binary data, estimator efficiency, generalized linear models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review