Artificial Intelligence to improve learning outcomes through online collaborative activities
Open accessAbstract
A key strategic objective of the University courses is the promotion and development of new and innovative teaching activities, also through the e-learning environment, with the aim of providing students with direct involvement in the learning process. Collaborative activities represent important and effective teaching methodologies that allow the improvements of learning outcomes through active learning. Furthermore, they can allow the development of soft skills because they enable learners to work together and practice critical reflection and conflict negotiation. Recently, online learning environments are being used to design and deliver assignments based on student work groups. Indeed, the development of digital technologies allows the organization of these online activities in a flexible way for both students and teachers. The goal of this work is to develop successful collaborative activities for undergraduate students to ensure the improvement of knowledge and soft skills on a specific topic. One of the fundamental factors that influence the success of collaborative learning is the students’ group formation, which consists in the realization of heterogeneous groups in terms of cognitive resources, characteristics, and behaviors, composed by four or five students. However, the correct implementation of groups requires careful profiling of each student’s behavior which can be difficult for the teacher to detect. In this work an intelligent software, developed using Artificial Intelligence algorithms, was used to assist the teacher in the realization of heterogeneous groups of students. It is composed of a Machine Learning model, consisting in clustering techniques applied to Moodle learning analytics performed to return clusters that identifies different students’ profiles, and a specific algorithm that automatically organizes the groups, ensuring the heterogeneity including at least one student from each cluster. At the end of the execution the software returns the list of the heterogeneous groups to the teacher. The software was applied to assignments that required working group within a specific online course for university students, using a Moodle e-learning platform. The quantitative analysis demonstrated the effectiveness of the numerical method for group composition proposed in this work to ensure successful collaborative activities, confirmed also by the perceptions of the students on the course.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI can facilitate collaborative learning by forming heterogeneous groups that maximize cognitive diversity, fostering critical reflection and improving learning outcomes.
“Additionally, AI can facilitate collaborative learning by forming heterogeneous groups that maximize cognitive diversity, fostering critical reflection and improving learning outcomes [177].”
From Leveraging AI in E-Learning: Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment through Cognitive Neuropsychology—A Systematic Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
Collaborative learning activities employing social learning principles enhance problem-solving skills by allowing learners to capitalize on peers' strengths.
“Collaborative learning activities that employ social learning principles further enhance problem-solving skills by allowing learners to capitalize on peers' strengths [177].”
From Leveraging AI in E-Learning: Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment through Cognitive Neuropsychology—A Systematic Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
AI systems can support heterogeneous group formation to foster cognitive diversity in collaborative problem-solving activities.
“AI systems can support heterogeneous group formation to foster cognitive diversity in collaborative problem-solving activities [177].”
From Leveraging AI in E-Learning: Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment through Cognitive Neuropsychology—A Systematic Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation
Frey, B. B. (2018) · doi:10.4135/9781506326139 · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
Group Work: How to Use Groups Effectively
Burke, A. S. (2011) · The Journal of Effective Teaching · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Sun, J. C. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.010 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Quasi-Experimental Research Designs
Thyer, B. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387384.001.0001 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Creativity and Group Innovation
Nijstad, B. A., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2002) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00984 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
A comparative analysis of forums and wikis as tools for online collaborative learning
Biasutti, M. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Gamified Collaborative Environment in Moodle
Hasan, H. F., Nat, M. C., & Vanduhe, V. Z. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2926622 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Methods of Assigning Players to Teams: A Review and Novel Approach
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Anderson, E. S. (2001) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/104687810103200102 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The use of multiple choice tests for formative and summative assessment
Roberts, T. S. (2006) · Figshare · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Clustering moodle data as a tool for profiling students
Bovo, A., Sanchez, S., Héguy, O., et al. (2013) · International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education · doi:10.1109/icelete.2013.6644359 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Nalli, G., Amendola, D., Perali, A., & Mostarda, L. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11135800 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Collaborative and Individual Learning in a Blended Learning Environment
van Eijl, P., Pilot, A., & VOOGD, P. D. (2005) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-005-6747-4 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Maina, E. M., Oboko, R. O., & Waiganjo, P. (2017) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications · doi:10.5815/ijisa.2017.03.04 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Pattern of non-task interactions in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning courses
Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F., & D’Ambra, J. D. (2012) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.641676 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Integrating Enhanced Peer Assessment Features in Moodle Learning Management System
Badea, G., Popescu, E., Sterbini, A., et al. (2019) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6908-7_19 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Online Physics laboratory for University courses
Amendola, D., & Miceli, C. (2016) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.20368/1971-8829/1165 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Landry, A., Jacobs, S., and Newton, G. (2015). "Effective use of peer assessment in writing assignment: a case study". International Journal of Higher Education, Vol 4, pp 38-51.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Halkiopoulos, C., & Gkintoni, E. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13183762 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
“Additionally, AI can facilitate collaborative learning by forming heterogeneous groups that maximize cognitive diversity, fostering critical reflection and improving learning outcomes [177].”
InfluentialPerformance of ChatGPT on registered nurse license exam in Taiwan: a descriptive study
Huang, H. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11212855 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review
Kleib, M., Darko, E. M., Akingbade, O., Kennedy, M., Majekodunmi, P., Nickel, E., & Vogelsang, L. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100252 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nalli, G., Amendola, D., & Smith, S.
- Affiliations
- Università di Camerino (IT)
- Middlesex University London (GB)
- Venue
- European Conference on e-Learning
- Published
- 2022-10-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 475-479
- ISSN
- 2048-8637 (ISSN-L)
- 2048-8645
- OpenAlex
- W4307030359
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Conference on e-Learning (publishedVersion)
- European Conference on e-Learning (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- online collaborative learning, heterogeneous student groups, group formation, learning analytics, Moodle, clustering, student profiling, artificial intelligence in education, online learning, soft skills, active learning, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review