SALIENCE OF NEGATIVE BRAND RELATIONSHIP AND ITS IMPACT ON CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR
Open accessAbstract
Marketing theory and practice has long shifted focus from just customer satisfaction to building customer relationship.Though a resultant positive brand relationship is aimed at, sometimes negative brand relationships evolve.Brand relationship literature proposes that just as positive and negative relationship exist in the interpersonal domain, positive negative relationship also develops in the person-object domain.Also, the different types of negative relationships that exist in the interpersonal domain can be extended to the person-object/brand domain.So, brands too take up negative roles such as master-slave, adversary, fling, secret lover etc.In this study, we try to understand which of such negative brand roles are salient?How does it affect the customer's tendency to persuade or dissuade others from purchasing the same brand?Are some negative relationships more salient than others?The study uses empirical data collected through structured questionnaire from 150 respondents.Such data is analysed using SPSS and it was found that some negative brand relationship based on consumer power are more salient than others and are likely to affect further consumer behaviour as influencers.The findings would contribute to the existing academic acumen by expanding the knowledge about those types of brand relationships which are more salient.For the brand managers it would throw light on the need to be wary of negative brand relationships that are more salient and needs immediate attention before it spirals into a tirade of negative word-of-mouth.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D, Bad is stronger than good. Review of general psychology, 5(4), 2001, pp 323.
- Kellermann, K, The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction. Communications Monographs, 51(1), 1984, pp 37-55.
- Fournier, S., Breazeale, M., & Fetscherin, M. (Eds.), Consumer-brand relationships: theory and practice. Routledge, 2012
- Alba, J. W., & Chattopadhyay, A, Effects of context and part-category cues on recall of competing brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 1985, pp 340-349.
- Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F, A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological review, 82(6), 1975, pp 407.
- Fournier, S, Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 1998 343-373.
- Simon, H. A, A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics, 69(1), 1955, pp 99-118.
- Anderson, N. H, Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(2), 1967, pp 158.
- Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J, Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European review of social psychology, 1(1), 1990, pp 33-60.
- Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E, Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological bulletin, 105(1), 1989, pp 131.
- Fiske, S. T., & Linville, P. W, What does the schema concept buy us? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 6(4), 1980, pp 543-557.
- Aaker, J. L, Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research, 1997, pp 347- 356.
- Hodges, B. H, Effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(3), 1974, pp 378. http://www.iaeme.com/JOM/index.asp 176 editor@iaeme.com
- Hamilton, D. L., & Huffman, L. J. Generality of impression formation processes for evaluative and nonevaluative judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, 200-207.
- Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T, What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 22(12), 1996, pp 1270-1279.
- Gilbert, A. N., Fridlund, A. J., & Sabini, J, Hedonic and social determinants of facial displays to odors. Chemical Senses, 12(2), 1987, pp 355-363.
- Finkenauer, C., & Rimé, B, Socially shared emotional experiences vs. emotional experiences kept secret: Differential characteristics and consequences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(3), 1998, pp 295-318.
- Robinson-Riegler, G. L., & Winton, W. M, The role of conscious recollection in recognition of affective material: Evidence for positive-negative asymmetry. The Journal of General Psychology, 123(2), 1996, pp 93-104.
- Winchester, M.K, "The exploration of negative brand image attributes", unpublished PhD dissertation, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 2005
- Alicke, M. D., Braun, J. C., Glor, J. E., Klotz, M. L., Magee, J., Sederhoim, H., & Siegel, R, Complaining behavior in social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 1992, pp 286-295.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selvarani, M., & Selvalakshmi, G. (2026) · European Public & Social Innovation Review · doi:10.31637/epsir-2026-2468
- Authors
- S, U.
- Venue
- JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
- Publisher
- IAEME Publication Chennai
- Published
- 2019-02-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2347-3940 (ISSN-L)
- 2347-3959
- OpenAlex
- W3002899010
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- consumer behavior, master-slave relations, consumer power, word of mouth, consumer influence, customer relationship management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review