CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Language and CultureCategorization, perception, and languageLinguistics and Language Studies

Epistemología de la lengua mapunzugun:

Open access
Teillier, Fernando, Llanquinao, Gabriel, Salamanca, Gastón·2020·Papeles de Trabajo. Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Etnolingüística y Antropología Socio-Cultural
DOI 10.35305/.v0i36.16
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Este artículo presenta una definición conceptual de tres vocablos del mapunzugun: Küpalme, Rakizuam y Güxam. Dichos vocablos se inscriben dentro de las categorías conceptuales Fuentes de la Visión de Mundo, Contenidos de la Visión de Mundo y Transmisión de la Visión de Mundo en Mapunzugun, respectivamente. Respecto de los términos señalados, se da cuenta de su Categorización, Aspectos Sociales y Aspectos Epistemológicos. Junto con ello, y como paso previo, se describen los cuatro ejes teóricos que contextualizan el trabajo (Relativismo Lingüístico, Constructivismo Radical, Etnolingüística Cognitiva y Epistemología de la Lengua y del Hablante). Los datos fueron provistos por seis hablantes nativos altamente competentes y el procedimiento de análisis de datos se basó en la Traducción Hermenéutica y el Análisis de Contenido

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35305/.v0i36.16

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indigenous knowledge is always principled, that is, normative and prescriptive.

    “If some statements sound too politically charged, it is because Indigenous knowledge is always principled, that is, normative (oriented toward ethical and moral goals) and prescriptive (oriented toward informing conducts) (Teillier et al., 2018).”

    From An Inside Sun: Lickanantay Volcanology in the Salar de Atacama (2022) · cites this paper as Teillier et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Teillier, F., Llanquinao, G., & Salamanca, G.
Affiliations
  • University of the Americas (CL)
  • Universidad Católica de Temuco (CL)
  • University of Concepción (CL)
ORCID
Llanquinao, Gabriel
Venue
Papeles de Trabajo. Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Etnolingüística y Antropología Socio-Cultural
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
Published
2020-03-12
Issue
36
Pages
100-122
ISSN
  • 0327-6147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1852-4508
DOI
10.35305/.v0i36.16
OpenAlex
W3012161834
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
Papeles de trabajo - Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Etnolingüística y Antropología Socio-Cultural/Papeles de trabajo (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
Keywords
epistemology of language, worldview, linguistic relativity, radical constructivism, cognitive ethnolinguistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review