The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Better by You, better than Me? ChatGPT-3 as writing assistance in students’ essays.
Open accessAbstract
Aim: To compare students' essay writing performance with or without employing ChatGPT-3 as a writing assistant tool.Materials and methods: Eighteen students participated in the study (nine in control and nine in the experimental group that used ChatGPT-3). We scored essay elements with grades (A-D) and corresponding numerical values (4-1). We compared essay scores to students' GPTs, writing time, authenticity, and content similarity. Results: Average grade was C for both groups; for control (2.39 ± 0.71) and for experimental (2.00 ± 0.73). None of the predictors affected essay scores: group (P = 0.184), writing duration (P = 0.669), module (P = 0.388), and GPA (P = 0.532). The text unauthenticity was slightly higher in the experimental group (11.87% ±13.45 to 9.96% ± 9.81%), but the similarity among essays was generally low in the overall sample (the Jaccard similarity index ranging from 0 to 0.054). In the experimental group, AI classifier recognized more potential AI-generated texts. Conclusions: This study found no evidence that using GPT as a writing tool improves essay quality since the control group outperformed the experimental group in most parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, other concerns include the current inability of ChatGPT to handle images as well as its low performance in some topics (e.g., failure to pass a parasitology exam for Korean medical students), and the issue of possible plagiarism [33,56,57,58,70,75].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, other concerns include the current inability of ChatGPT to handle images as well as its low performance in some topics (e.g., failure to pass a parasitology exam for Korean medical students), and the issue of possible plagiarism [33,56,57,58,70,75].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, other concerns include the current inability of ChatGPT to handle images as well as its low performance in some topics (e.g., failure to pass a parasitology exam for Korean medical students), and the issue of possible plagiarism [33,56,57,58,70,75].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In the UK, an anonymous survey by the Higher Education Policy Institute 2 found that 88% of undergraduates reported using GenAI in assessments in 2024/25.”
From Style, sentiment, and quality of undergraduate writing in the AI era: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of 4,820 authentic empirical reports (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Second, an anonymous survey 29 of over 1000 British undergraduate students revealed that 30% reported using GenAI tools to generate text for their coursework in November 2023, a figure that rose to 64% in December 2024 2 .”
From Style, sentiment, and quality of undergraduate writing in the AI era: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of 4,820 authentic empirical reports (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115
Sallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 · Cited by 3,087
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/mrz8h · Cited by 3,079
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
Lo, C. K. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13040410 · Cited by 2,024
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 · Cited by 1,384
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6 · Cited by 1,099
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.23.521610 · Cited by 1,099
AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays — should professors worry?
Stokel-Walker, C. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7 · Cited by 543
OpenAI ChatGPT Generated Literature Review: Digital Twin in Healthcare
Aydın, Ö., & Karaarslan, E. (2022) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4308687 · Cited by 391
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pourhoseingholi MA, Hatamnejad MR, Solhpour A (2023) Does chatGPT (or any other artificial intelligence language tools) deserve to be included in authorship list? chatGPT and authorship. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 16(1):435-437
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–190 of 190
Ofusori, L. O., & Hendradi, R. (2025) · Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence · doi:10.20473/jisebi.11.1.65-78 · Cited by 9
Hoàng, N. H. (2025) · The JALT CALL Journal · doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v21n2.102429 · Cited by 9
University Students’ Perspective on ChatGPT and Technology Literacies
Dawa, T., Dhendup, S., Tashi, S., & Rosso, M. A. (2024) · Educational innovation and practice · doi:10.17102/eip.7.2024.10 · Cited by 4
Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT by University and High School Students
Szügyi, J. S., Szügyi, E., & Takács, M. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI) · doi:10.1109/saci60582.2024.10619721 · Cited by 5
Artificial Intelligence in Sport Scientific Creation and Writing Process
Latzel, R., & Glauner, P. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67256-9_2 · Cited by 4
Intention to use ChatGPT among law educators in Saudi Arabia
Sarabdeen, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1631413 · Cited by 4
Impact of generative models on higher education: exploring opportunities and challenges
Zheng, Q., Yuan, X., & Xu, L. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13742-y · Cited by 5
Can ChatGPT as a generative AI tool enhance university student academic achievement?
Yu, Q., Yu, K., Yang, R., & Li, B. (2025) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2025.2605651 · Cited by 5
Student Perspectives on GenAI : Usage, Attitudes, and Academic Integrity in Psychology Education
Bloxham, A., Newham, T., Ryding, C., & Hadlington, L. (2026) · Applied AI Letters · doi:10.1002/ail2.70025 · Cited by 3
When AI Thinks for Us: Unveiling the Cognitive and Social Toll of ChatGPT Over‐Reliance
Farhat, Z. (2026) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70205 · Cited by 3
Oliński, M., & Sieciński, K. (2025) · Youth · doi:10.3390/youth5040106 · Cited by 4
A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in Explaining Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsPreprint
Gonzalez, D. T., Djulbegovic, M. B., Kim, C. K., Antonietti, M., Gameiro, G. R., & Uversky, V. N. (2023) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202308.1014.v1 · Cited by 3
Girona, M. T. M., Medina, S. K., & Lillo-Fuentes, F. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1706236 · Cited by 2
Modeling Trust Recalibration in AI Dialogue: Conversational Repair Strategies in ChatGPT
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Phivos Mylonas, B., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2025) · International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP) · doi:10.1109/smap66932.2025.00030 · Cited by 2
A systematic review of AI-assisted academic writing: Tools, measures, and effects
Meng, Q., Xie, Y.-N., & Lu, D. (2026) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101726 · Cited by 5
A Case Study on Creative English Writing Using Generative AI
Yi, Y. (2024) · Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange · doi:10.47116/apjcri.2024.04.44 · Cited by 2
Sun, R., Hu, X., Shao, Y., Luo, Z., Liu, B., & Cheng, Y. (2025) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym17101713 · Cited by 3
Harnessing AI for Geosciences Education: A Deep Dive into ChatGPT's ImpactPreprint
Patra, S., Singha, T. S., Kanvinde, M., Mazumdar, A., & Kanjilal, S. (2024) · doi:10.5194/gc-2023-7 · Cited by 3
Enhancing Academic Writing and Engagement: ChatGPT Impact on EFL Indian UndergraduatesPreprint
Swargiary, K. (2024) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202405.0130.v1 · Cited by 2
Mak, M. H. C., & Walasek, L. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100507 · Cited by 10
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TERMINOLOGY PROCESSING: TESTING THE ROBUSTNESS OF A CUSTOM GPT
Nahod, B., & Nahod, P. V. (2024) · SWS International Scientific Conference on Arts and Humanities · doi:10.35603/sws.iscah.2024/fs11.21 · Cited by 1
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: composing a for-and-against essay
Вовк, О., & Kryvoshyia, D. (2024) · Prosvita. · doi:10.36074/prosvita.issue1.002 · Cited by 1
Using Generative Artificial Intelligence to Support Young Writers: Ethical Stickiness
Kershen, J. L., & Johnson, B. (2025) · The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas · doi:10.1080/00098655.2025.2510298 · Cited by 1
A taxonomy of standardized terms for generative AI use in the composition classroom
D’Addario, M. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00655-8 · Cited by 3
Safeguarding Crowdsourcing Surveys from ChatGPT through Prompt Injection
Wang, C., Freire, S. K., Zhang, M., Wei, J., Gonçalves, J., Kostakos, V., Bozzon, A., & Niforatos, E. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757503 · Cited by 27
Ziyang, X. (2025) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1297 · Cited by 1
Wahyuni, S. F., Putro, N. H. P. S., Efendi, A., & Andriyani, N. (2026) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-026-09753-0 · Cited by 4
Redefining Undergraduate Computing Education with GenAI-Facilitated Authentic In-Term Assessment
Masood, A., Wijeratne, V., & Alam, A. S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale66047.2025.11346650 · Cited by 1
Jin, H., Li, Y., Jiang, Y., & Dong, C. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2628044 · Cited by 1
Ton‐Nu, A. T., & Barrot, J. S. (2026) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2026.2642394 · Cited by 2
Color me confounded: A critical analysis of media comparisons on ChatGPT in education
Lawson, A. P., Martella, A. M., Weidlich, J., Mulders, M., & Buchner, J. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105701 · Cited by 1
Examining the Effect of ChatGPT on Small Group Ideation Discussions
Chosokabe, M., Koie, S., & Oyamada, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59373-4_12 · Cited by 1
Вовк, О. І., & Кривошия, Д. Ю. (2024) · Педагогічна Академія наукові записки · doi:10.57125/pedacademy.2024.05.29.13 · Cited by 1
Using ChatGPT to Assist Writers with Planning Writing Tasks in an EFL Classroom
You, Y.-L., Lin, A., Han, S.-J., Chu, C.-C., & Dai, C.-Y. (2024) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64487-0_11 · Cited by 1
Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of ChatGPT in Enhancing ESL Learners Writing Skills
Seelro, S., & Khan, M. A. (2024) · Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review · doi:10.48112/aessr.v4i4.885 · Cited by 4
AI-Based Feedback Model in Supporting Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Environment
Chen, J. (2024) · International Conference on Software, Systems and Information Technology (SSITCON) · doi:10.1109/ssitcon62437.2024.10796990 · Cited by 3
Rico-Gutierrez, L. M. (2025) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016645 · Cited by 1
Advancing Education through AI: The Role of ChatGPT as Virtual Tutors in the Future of Learning
Graefen, B., & Fazal, N. (2023) · Annals of Pharmacy Education Safety and Public Health Advocacy · doi:10.51847/luftksf1zo · Cited by 1
Review on ChatGPT: History, Applications and Limitations in Chemistry
Etim, E. I. (2023) · Physical Science & Biophysics Journal · doi:10.23880/psbj-16000263 · Cited by 1
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Project Completion in EducationPreprint
Swargiary, K., & Roy, K. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/adg6h8.2 · Cited by 1
The Assistance of Chatgpt-3.5 in Teaching English Academic WritingPreprint
Wang, M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4726032 · Cited by 1
Developing the HAKI model as a conceptual framework for AI-assisted academic research
Shahini, A. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-02041-4
Coevolution with artificial intelligence: are we at the start of a new era for academic publishing?Preprint
Vuong, Q., La, V., Nguyen, M., Jin, R., & Le, T.-T. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/hsu5v
تصور مقترح لتفعيل أداة ChatGPT لرفع الأداء التعليمي لدي معلمات رياض الأطفال
عبدالله, م. إ. م. (2023) · مجلة الطفولة · doi:10.21608/jchild.2023.195695.1167
Új kihívások előtt: A Mesterséges Értelem és az egyetemi oktatás
Kovács, Á. E., & Pető, I. (2023) · Multidiszciplináris kihívások sokszínű válaszok · doi:10.33565/mksv.2023.02.02 · Cited by 1
مستقبل التعليم: إمكانات وعواقب وتحديات الذكاء الاصطناعي
الهادي, م. (2024) · Compunet ( The Egyptian Information Journal ) · doi:10.21608/jstc.2024.338391
Patra, S., Singha, T. S., Kanvinde, M., et al. (2024) · doi:10.5194/gc-2023-7-rc1
Patra, S. (2024) · doi:10.5194/gc-2023-7-ac1
Machine learning's impact on medical education and research: beneficial or detrimental?
Subramaniam, S. K., Gounder, P. K., Mahmood, A. A. R., Anandaram, H., Polevoy, G. G., & Pichandy, M. P. (2024) · International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) · doi:10.11591/ijphs.v13i3.24330
Patra, S., Singha, T. S., Kanvinde, M., et al. (2024) · doi:10.5194/gc-2023-7-rc2
Patra, S. (2024) · doi:10.5194/gc-2023-7-ac2
A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in Explaining Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsPreprint
Gonzalez, D. T., Djulbegovic, M. B., Kim, C. K., Antonietti, M., Gameiro, G. R., & Uversky, V. N. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/5d952o
A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in Explaining Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsPreprint
Gonzalez, D. T., Djulbegovic, M. B., Kim, C. K., Antonietti, M., Gameiro, G. R., & Uversky, V. N. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/5d952o.2
WRITING A CRITICAL ACADEMIC ESSAY: WITH OR WITHOUT CHATGPT?
Вовк, О., & Kryvoshyia, D. (2024) · ГРААЛЬ НАУКИ · doi:10.36074/grail-of-science.06.09.2024.058
Elias, A. G., & Lopes, R. D. S. (2024) · doi:10.5753/eri-mt.2024.245825
ACADEMIC RESEARCH: ROLE OF AI IN SCHOLARLY PRACTICES
Bhat, M. S. (2024) · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.4447
USING GENERATIVE-AI TO SUPPORT CARER TELEPHONE SUPPORT SERVICES: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
FUNG, K. Y., WONG, W. T., & Fok, D. Y. H. (2024) · The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1142/s0219246224500043
Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5274267
Gunawardana, H. M. R. S. S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6001-8_7
Frozen in Time: Croatian Policies on Academic Integrity and GenAI in Higher Education
Pavletić, P. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92534-4_10
AI Opportunities and Challenges for Students with Learning Disabilities
Tezerjani, M. D., Savage, R. S., Roshanbin, M., & Baneshi, A. R. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93022-5_9 · Cited by 1
Human-AI Collaboration in Vietnamese Students’ Argumentative Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study
Le, T. B., & Khâm, B. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01348-4_6 · Cited by 1
Keeping Knowledge Alive in the Age of Anti-Education, Disinformation, and Artificial Intelligence
Low, D. S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-97999-6_2
Adelhardt, Z., & Eberle, T. (2025) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-5234-4_1
Web Wiki-Based Collaborative Writing: Impacts on Scientific Writing, Self-Regulation, and Efficacy
Erdawati, E., Suryoputro, G., & Hikmat, A. (2025) · JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia) · doi:10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v14i4.101205
Loya, N. S. F., Gonsalez, T. G. Q., Malquin, E. M. C., Bautista, M. S. C., & Cáceres, G. A. R. (2026) · ASCE MAGAZINE · doi:10.70577/asce.v5i1.638
Yoo, T.-A., Yang, H.-S., Kim, M., & Chung, J. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2646275 · Cited by 1
Instructional Mechanisms for Professional Writing: A Comparison of Scaffolded Annotation and ChatGPT
Corvite, S., Matz, R. L., Mills, M., & Hui, J. S. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790915
Prevatt-Goldstein, A., & Chandler, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05692-4_7
Jung, Y., Mun, S., & Jeong, G. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2662407
정, 남. (2026) · Modern English Education · doi:10.18095/meeso.2026.27.1.197
Xiang, X., Tang, J., Dong, S., Luo, Z., & Qin, C. (2026) · International Conference on Educational and Information Technology · doi:10.1109/iceit68991.2026.11521387
Turós, M., Soltész-Várhelyi, K., & Szűts, Z. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16060920 · Cited by 1
Sabour, M., & Lehfid, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19585-2_9
Uyar, A. (2026) · Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age · doi:10.53850/joltida.1825745
Exploring University Students’ Perceptions on Employing LLMs for Academic Writing
Rezaei, L. S., & Eika, E. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30784-2_7
The effect of artificial intelligence on students’ writing performance: a meta-analysis
Wu, J., Chen, Q., Jiang, H., & Bai, X. (2026) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-026-10884-4 · Cited by 1
Phase-Dependent Effects of Cognitive Autonomy on Student Performance in AI-Assisted LearningPreprint
Alnahhal, M., Gemedu, N., Matar, A., Alnaimat, B. H., Mаkhmudov, S., & Tabash, M. I. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10021122/v1
Critical reflections on AI integration in graduate research writing
Pham, V. P. H., & Nguyen, N. H. V. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1877950 · Cited by 1
Withanage, W. D. M. D., Nissanka, N. M. T. A., Wickramasinghe, C. P., Fernando, W. P. P. D., Perera, V., & Gunatilake, G. D. (2026) · Access Microbiology · doi:10.1099/acmi.0.001137.v5
Leng, R., Gu, T., Qian, L., Wang, X., & Li, W. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649811
Ding, Q., Ye, J., Wang, N., & Liu, L. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2726354
Basan, S. A. A., BATULANON, A. A., Enanoria, S. M., Gioca, A. K., Lemente, L. C., Niñal, M. F. E., Orillo, D. G. L., & Razonable, J. P. C. (2026) · International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies · doi:10.67903/ijroms0239
Babori, A. (2026) · Pedagogical Research · doi:10.29333/pr/19252
Xiao, Q., & Sun, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1892877
The bright highlights and the dark shadows of artificial intelligence in higher education
Sejdiu, N. P., Rosner, M., & Sejdiu, S. (2026) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.24951.1
Too Much Mind Extension? Towards a Virtue Ethics of the Extended Mind
Chlebowski, S., Ratajczyk, D., & Wyrwa, M. (2026) · Roczniki Filozoficzne · doi:10.18290/rf26743.6
Generative AI for Healthcare and Education
Sartori, L., & Piva, R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61050-9_41-1
Tansilo, H., Putra, Y. S., Sari, A. S., & Hastomo, T. (2026) · Humanitatis Journal of Language and Literature · doi:10.30812/humanitatis.v12i2.5836
Kusumasari, B., & Sajida, S. (2026) · Public Administration and Policy · doi:10.1108/pap-01-2026-0005
Metadata
- Authors
- Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., & Jerković, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Split (HR)
- Corresponding author
- Banovac, Ana
- Venue
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2023-02-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388000629
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 30
- FWCI
- 44.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT-3.5, AI-assisted writing, student essay writing, academic writing, AI-generated text detection, textual authenticity, essay quality, writing performance, large language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
