The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Better by You, better than Me? ChatGPT-3 as writing assistance in students’ essays.
Open accessAbstract
Aim: To compare students' essay writing performance with or without employing ChatGPT-3 as a writing assistant tool.Materials and methods: Eighteen students participated in the study (nine in control and nine in the experimental group that used ChatGPT-3). We scored essay elements with grades (A-D) and corresponding numerical values (4-1). We compared essay scores to students' GPTs, writing time, authenticity, and content similarity. Results: Average grade was C for both groups; for control (2.39 ± 0.71) and for experimental (2.00 ± 0.73). None of the predictors affected essay scores: group (P = 0.184), writing duration (P = 0.669), module (P = 0.388), and GPA (P = 0.532). The text unauthenticity was slightly higher in the experimental group (11.87% ±13.45 to 9.96% ± 9.81%), but the similarity among essays was generally low in the overall sample (the Jaccard similarity index ranging from 0 to 0.054). In the experimental group, AI classifier recognized more potential AI-generated texts. Conclusions: This study found no evidence that using GPT as a writing tool improves essay quality since the control group outperformed the experimental group in most parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, other concerns include the current inability of ChatGPT to handle images as well as its low performance in some topics (e.g., failure to pass a parasitology exam for Korean medical students), and the issue of possible plagiarism [33,56,57,58,70,75].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, other concerns include the current inability of ChatGPT to handle images as well as its low performance in some topics (e.g., failure to pass a parasitology exam for Korean medical students), and the issue of possible plagiarism [33,56,57,58,70,75].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, other concerns include the current inability of ChatGPT to handle images as well as its low performance in some topics (e.g., failure to pass a parasitology exam for Korean medical students), and the issue of possible plagiarism [33,56,57,58,70,75].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In the UK, an anonymous survey by the Higher Education Policy Institute 2 found that 88% of undergraduates reported using GenAI in assessments in 2024/25.”
From Style, sentiment, and quality of undergraduate writing in the AI era: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of 4,820 authentic empirical reports (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Second, an anonymous survey 29 of over 1000 British undergraduate students revealed that 30% reported using GenAI tools to generate text for their coursework in November 2023, a figure that rose to 64% in December 2024 2 .”
From Style, sentiment, and quality of undergraduate writing in the AI era: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of 4,820 authentic empirical reports (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115
Sallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 · Cited by 3,087
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/mrz8h · Cited by 3,079
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
Lo, C. K. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13040410 · Cited by 2,024
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 · Cited by 1,384
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6 · Cited by 1,099
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.23.521610 · Cited by 1,099
AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays — should professors worry?
Stokel-Walker, C. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7 · Cited by 543
OpenAI ChatGPT Generated Literature Review: Digital Twin in Healthcare
Aydın, Ö., & Karaarslan, E. (2022) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4308687 · Cited by 391
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pourhoseingholi MA, Hatamnejad MR, Solhpour A (2023) Does chatGPT (or any other artificial intelligence language tools) deserve to be included in authorship list? chatGPT and authorship. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 16(1):435-437
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
Lo, C. K. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13040410 · Cited by 2,024
Grassini, S. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070692 · Cited by 1,048
Summary of ChatGPT-Related research and perspective towards the future of large language models
Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., et al. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017 · Cited by 855
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 · Cited by 717
Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224 · Cited by 531
The Influence of ChatGPT on Student Engagement: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100 · Cited by 392
Sun, Y., Sheng, D., Zhou, Z., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03811-x · Cited by 327
Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y · Cited by 322
RetractedAnsari, A. N., Ahmad, S., & Bhutta, S. M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12223-4 · Cited by 198
A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education
Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2 · Cited by 191
Let’s Have a Chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, Applications, and Limitations
Shahriar, S., & Hayawi, K. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.47852/bonviewaia3202939 · Cited by 167
Let's have a chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, Applications, and Limitations
Shahriar, S., & Hayawi, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13817 · Cited by 167
An explorative assessment of ChatGPT as an aid in medical education: Use it with caution
Han, Z., Battaglia, F., Udaiyar, A., Fooks, A. N., & Terlecky, S. R. (2023) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2023.2271159 · Cited by 144
Sun, L., & Zhou, L. (2024) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331241277937 · Cited by 129
Li, Y., Zhou, X., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2400090 · Cited by 172
Ahmed, Z., Shanto, S. S., Rime, M. H. K., Morol, M. K., Fahad, N., Hossen, M. J., & Abdullah-Al-Jubair, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3461874 · Cited by 123
ChatGPT in Computer Science Curriculum Assessment: An analysis of Its Successes and Shortcomings
Qureshi, B. (2023) · International Conference e-Society, e-Learning and e-Technologies · doi:10.1145/3613944.3613946 · Cited by 195
Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1347421 · Cited by 99
A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets
Laskar, M. T. R., Bari, M. S., Rahman, M., Bhuiyan, M. A. H., Joty, S., & Huang, J. X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.29 · Cited by 160
Naznin, K., Mahmud, A. A., Nguyen, M. T., & Chua, C. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14020053 · Cited by 123
How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support?
Levine, S., Beck, S. W., Mah, C., Phalen, L., & PIttman, J. (2025) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.1373 · Cited by 83
Shi, J., Liu, W., & Hu, K. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15050705 · Cited by 77
A Cross Sectional Study of ChatGPT in Translation: Magnitude of Use, Attitudes, and Uncertainties
Sahari, Y., Al-kadi, A. M. T., & Ali, J. K. M. (2023) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-023-10031-y · Cited by 77
Wang, R. E., & Demszky, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03090 · Cited by 74
ChatGPT: Systematic Review, Applications, and Agenda for Multidisciplinary Research
Singh, H., & Singh, A. (2023) · Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies · doi:10.1080/14765284.2023.2210482 · Cited by 82
Perceptions of Higher Education Students towards ChatGPT Usage
Das, S. R., & Madhusudan, J. V. (2024) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.583 · Cited by 103
Exploring the frontiers of LLMs in psychological applications: a comprehensive review
Ke, L., Tong, S., Cheng, P., & Peng, K. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11297-5 · Cited by 117
Seeing ChatGPT Through Students’ Eyes: An Analysis of TikTok Data
Haensch, A., Ball, S. L., Herklotz, M., & Kreuter, F. (2023) · 2023 Big Data Meets Survey Science (BigSurv) · doi:10.1109/bigsurv59479.2023.10486710 · Cited by 86
Liu, J., Li, S., & Dong, Q. (2024) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331241242441 · Cited by 74
Ma, W., Wen-jing, M., Hu, Y., & Xinyu, B. I. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13128-6 · Cited by 71
Visual cognition in multimodal large language models
Schulze Buschoff, L. M., Akata, E., Bethge, M., & Schulz, E. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00963-y · Cited by 83
Li, Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13574-w · Cited by 87
Bob or Bot: Exploring ChatGPT's Answers to University Computer Science Assessment
Richards, M., Waugh, K., Slaymaker, M., Petre, M., Woodthorpe, J., & Gooch, D. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3633287 · Cited by 52
Harnessing Large Language Models for Cognitive Assistants in Factories
Freire, S. K., Foosherian, M., Wang, C., & Niforatos, E. (2023) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3571884.3604313 · Cited by 61
Potential Benefits and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Özer, M. (2024) · Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education · doi:10.14686/buefad.1416087 · Cited by 72
Li, Y., Zhou, X., Yin, H., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-025-00379-0 · Cited by 102
ChatGPT Writing Assistance and Evaluation Assignments Across the Chemistry Curriculum
Ruff, E. F., Engen, M. A., Franz, J. L., Mauser, J. F., West, J. K., & Zemke, J. M. O. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00248 · Cited by 59
The Impact of ChatGPT on Students' Academic Achievement: A Meta‐Analysis
Liu, Z., Zuo, H., & Lu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70096 · Cited by 44
Cheng, M. W. T., & YIM, I. H. Y. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-023-00081-8 · Cited by 44
Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of labor market: a systematic review
Salari, N., Beiromvand, M., Hosseinian-Far, A., Habibi, J., Babajani, F., & Mohammadi, M. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100652 · Cited by 49
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2266490 · Cited by 59
Liu, J., & Li, S. (2024) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331241240460 · Cited by 53
Gozali, I., Wijaya, A. R. T., Lie, A., Cahyono, B. Y., & Suryati, N. (2024) · The JALT CALL Journal · doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v20n1.1200 · Cited by 82
Wang, R., & Demszky, D. (2023) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.53 · Cited by 41
Aladsani, H. K. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2487517 · Cited by 33
Prandner, D., Wetzelhütter, D., & Hese, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1417900 · Cited by 45
Chat bots to Virtual Tutors: An Overview of Chat GPT's Role in the Future of Education
Graefen, B., & Fazal, N. (2024) · Archives of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.51847/touppjedsx · Cited by 38
Wang, R., & Demszky, D. (2023) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5vrby · Cited by 74
A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on ChatGPT in EducationPreprint
Albadarin, Y., Tukiainen, M., Saqr, M., & Pope, N. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4562771 · Cited by 26
Zhang, M., & Crosthwaite, P. (2026) · International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2024-0196 · Cited by 26
Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., & Salloum, A. (2024) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_25 · Cited by 25
Artificial intelligence in applied (linguistics): a content analysis and future prospects
Alaqlobi, O., Alduais, A. M. S., Qasem, F. A. A., & Alasmari, M. (2024) · Cogent Arts and Humanities · doi:10.1080/23311983.2024.2382422 · Cited by 50
Jain, R. K., & Jain, A. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66329-1_42 · Cited by 62
Writing without borders: AI and cross-cultural convergence in academic writing quality
Prakash, A., Aggarwal, S., Varghese, J. J., & Varghese, J. J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05484-6 · Cited by 35
ChatGPT in foreign language lesson plan creation: Trends, variability, and historical biases
Dornburg, A., & Davin, K. J. (2024) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344024000272 · Cited by 43
A Learners’ Dictionary Versus ChatGPT in Receptive and Productive Lexical Tasks
Ptasznik, B., Wolfer, S., & Lew, R. (2024) · International Journal of Lexicography · doi:10.1093/ijl/ecae011 · Cited by 22
A Study on Using ChatGPT to Help Students With Dyslexia Learn Chinese and English Writing
Fung, K. Y., Fung, K. C., Lee, L., Lui, R. T. L., Qu, H., Song, S., & Sin, K. F. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311251358269 · Cited by 29
Ordak, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11182554 · Cited by 26
One year in the classroom with ChatGPT: empirical insights and transformative impacts
Guo, F., Li, T., & Cunningham, C. J. L. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1574477 · Cited by 35
Is ChatGPT Enhancing Youth’s Learning, Engagement and Satisfaction?
Shah, C. S., Mathur, S., & Vishnoi, S. K. (2024) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2024.2380698 · Cited by 22
Li, Y., Wu, Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2026) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2025.2493942 · Cited by 19
“They also create authentic learning experiences (Tai & Chen, 2024) and offer drilling practice opportunities (Bašić et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2023).”
A review of ChatGPT in medical education: exploring advantages and limitations
Cheng, Y., & Zhu, L. (2025) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000002505 · Cited by 26
Graduate Teacher Education Students Use and Evaluate ChatGPT as an Essay-Writing Tool
Picciano, A. G. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i2.4373 · Cited by 30
Class integration of ChatGPT and learning analytics for higher education
Civit, M., Escalona, M. J., Cuadrado, F., & de Cózar, S. R. (2024) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13703 · Cited by 25
Román-Acosta, D. (2024) · LatIA · doi:10.62486/latia2024110 · Cited by 30
Chan, V. C. (2025) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.003 · Cited by 17
Shahsavar, Z., Kafipour, R., Khojasteh, L., & Pakdel, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1457744 · Cited by 32
Investigating the Accuracy of ChatGPT as a Writing Error Correction Tool
Alsaweed, W., & Aljebreen, S. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.364847 · Cited by 15
Toward non-human-centered design: designing an academic article with ChatGPT
LİVBERBER, T. (2023) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.sep.12 · Cited by 18
Pham, N. N. H. (2025) · International journal of AI in language education. · doi:10.54855/ijaile.25213 · Cited by 26
ChatGPT's Applications in Higher Education: Unmasking Opportunities and Challenges
Sarker, D. R., Eiaz-Ur-Rahman, A. F. M., Sakib, A. R., Terano, H. J. R., & Rahman, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Education Management and Development Studies · doi:10.52631/jemds.v3i4.250 · Cited by 13
The missing story of GenAI summarisers: a critical research agenda
Corbin, T., & Walton, J. (2025) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2025.2486185 · Cited by 18
Voices from the Flip: Teacher Perspectives on Integrating AI Chatbots in Flipped English Classrooms
Ling, Y., & Jan, J. M. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091219 · Cited by 17
ChatGPT: A reliable assistant for the evaluation of students’ written texts?
Atasoy, A., & Arani, S. M. N. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13553-1 · Cited by 19
The impact of using ChatGPT on EFL students’ writing
Xu, J., Gao, J., Gong, X., Shadiev, R., & Li, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt61570.2024.00043 · Cited by 14
ChatGPT-3.5 as an automatic scoring system and feedback provider in IELTS exams
Chen, X., Zhou, Z., & Prado, M. C. D. A. (2025) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.1496193 · Cited by 19
Exploring the difference and quality of AI-generated versus human-written texts
Tengler, K., & Brandhofer, G. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00529-z · Cited by 21
Wang, J. (2024) · Journal of Technical Writing and Communication · doi:10.1177/00472816241260033 · Cited by 11
Artificial Intelligence to Support Writing Outcomes for Students With Disabilities
Goldman, S. R., Smith, S. J., & Carreon, A. (2025) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/01626434251326328 · Cited by 9
Pakdel, F., Khojasteh, L., Kafipour, R., & Shahsavar, Z. (2025) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688251322953 · Cited by 11
Boon or Bane? Evaluating AI-driven learning assistance in higher education professional coursework
Sun, Y., Yang, H., Yu, H. K., & Suen, R. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13642-1 · Cited by 12
Using ChatGPT to Teach English for Academic Purposes
Glahn, K. (2024) · Journal of Education, Innovation, and Communication. · doi:10.34097/jeicom-5-2-december-23-5 · Cited by 9
Medina, W. A. A., Velásquez, C. H. F., Olivares-Zegarra, S., Morales-Romero, G., Quispe-Andía, A., Aybar-Bellido, I., Palacios-Huaraca, C., Aldana-Trejo, F., & Alvarado-Bravo, N. (2024) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.23.12.19 · Cited by 18
Pretorius, M., & Thewissen, J. (2026) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101286 · Cited by 17
Studying with GenAI: Student views on the opportunities and risks of GenAI in higher education
Cena, E., McParland, A., Toivo, W., Dalton, B., Mundy, M., O'Connor, P. A., Robertson, A., Swingler, M. V., Wilson, P. C., & Duncan, C. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-13923-3 · Cited by 11
Bıdık, N. Ü. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12848 · Cited by 7
Cao, S., & Zhou, T. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251369204 · Cited by 80
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education?
NAGAR, L. (2024) · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.55041/ijsrem32175 · Cited by 7
Kotsis, K. Τ. (2025) · European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning · doi:10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(3).14 · Cited by 7
Cox, G., Willmers, M., Brown, R., & Held, M. F. G. (2024) · Mousaion South African Journal of Information Studies · doi:10.25159/2663-659x/15331 · Cited by 6
Kaliterna, M., Žuljević, M. F., Ursić, L., Krka, J., & Duplančić, D. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77576-3 · Cited by 13
Liu, W., & Liu, X. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329410 · Cited by 5
Yao-jun, R., & Tekwa, K. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13516-6 · Cited by 6
Overview of ChatGPT Model Architecture
Pandey, M. K., & Upadhyay, J. (2023) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0502-7.ch005 · Cited by 5
ChatGPT Impact on EFL Indian UndergraduatesPreprint
Roy, K., & Swargiary, K. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.20944/preprints202405.0130.v2 · Cited by 9
Gambo, O. O., Onifade, O. J., Olanrewaju-Smart, W., Abuya, O. J., Salawu, R. E., Massenon, R., & Gambo, I. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01142-4 · Cited by 10
suo, X., Yin, B., Wang, W., & Guo, L. (2026) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331261433396 · Cited by 7
Advantages and Disadvantages of Chatgpt in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Asmiddin, A. M., Nurhuda, P., & Megawati, R. (2023) · Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA · doi:10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6576 · Cited by 6
Educational Innovation in the Information Age
Mrabet, J., Studholme, R., & Thompson, N. L. (2024) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3096-8.ch013 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., & Jerković, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Split (HR)
- Corresponding author
- Banovac, Ana
- Venue
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2023-02-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388000629
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 30
- FWCI
- 44.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT-3.5, AI-assisted writing, student essay writing, academic writing, AI-generated text detection, textual authenticity, essay quality, writing performance, large language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review