Cited by 17Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Deep Neural Networks Analysis of Borescope Images

Open access
Svensen, Markus, Powrie, Honor E G, Hardwick, David S·2018·PHM Society European Conference

Abstract

This paper presents results on applying deep neural networks to analysis of images from borescope inspections of large turbofan engines, carried out in the field. Such inspections are done as a part of routine monitoring and maintenance as well as an initial, investigative response to alerts from automatic monitoring systems, pilots or engineers. Across GE’s commercial engines fleet, a substantial number of images have been gathered this way. The deep learning techniques that have come out of computer vision and machine learning research in the last decade offer new possibilities for analyzing and mining such data collections. This paper presents initial results on separating borescope images from images created with regular digital cameras, as well as classifying images containing various engine parts, with average accuracy of 95% and 77%, respectively, on unseen validation data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36001/phme.2018.v4i1.401

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a lack of recent applications of classical image processing techniques to blade inspection.

    “There is a lack of recent applications of these techniques to blade inspection. In fact, the field is somewhat weak and has been dominated by the neural networks and deep learning approaches instead [9,19,47,85].”

    From Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Abstract describes this paper’s use of deep neural networks for borescope images, and the Conclusion and Discussion mentions another neural-network application to turbine-blade images. Neither passage assesses how many recent blade-inspection studies use classical image processing. Searches for classical and traditional image-processing approaches found no such assessment in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Svensen, M., Powrie, H. E. G., & Hardwick, D. S.
Venue
PHM Society European Conference
Publisher
PHM Society
Published
2018-06-30
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2325-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886713210
Cited by
17
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
PHM Society European Conference (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
turbofan engine, deep neural network, image classification, aircraft engine maintenance, condition monitoring, image data mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review