Cited by 31Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningWriting and Handwriting Education

Developing Metacognitive Writing Strategy to Enhance Writing Skills Viewed from Prospective Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills

Open access
Kazemian, Mohammad, Irawan, Lalu Ari, Haerazi, Haerazi·2021·Journal of Language and Literature Studies

Abstract

The metacognitive awareness and critical thinking skills were essential to be subjected to the prospective teachers to regulate their learning and train how to practice writing effectively. This study was aimed at developing the model of the metacognitive writing strategy to improve prospective teachers’ writing skills viewed from critical thinking skills in Indonesian higher education. To attain the research aim, the research and development (R&D) study was employed. The stages of R&D design included defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. To attest to the effectiveness of the metacognitive writing strategy, the researcher used a quasi-experimental design in the form of pre-test and post-test control group design. The prospective teachers were divided into two groups, the experimental and control group. The experimental group was treated using the metacognitive writing strategy, while the control group was taught using the conventional strategy. The instruments of collecting data used the metacognitive writing test and critical thinking test. Then, the data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical devices. The results of the study showed that the metacognitive writing strategy can help prospective teachers to regulate their learning activities in terms of what and how to write in the class. At the top of that, they are able to compose good exposition texts. It was proven that the average score of learners in the experimental class was higher than those on the control class. The research findings were elaborated in the research discussion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36312/jolls.v1i1.499

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Kuncel, N. R. (2011). Measurement and meaning of critical thinking (research report for the NRC 21st century skills workshop). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  2. Lampert, N. (2011). A study of an after-school art program and critical thinking. International Journal of Education through Art,7(1) pp. 55-67
  3. MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive perspective. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.). Handbook of writing research (pp. 24-40). New York/London: Guilford Press.
  4. Patel, N. K. (2018). Effect of Integrated Feedback on Classroom Climate of Secondary School Teachers, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7.i1.11146 · DOI
  5. Schnotz, W. (1992). Metacognition and self-regulation in text processing: Some comments. In M. Carretero, M. L. Pope, R. J. Simons, & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), Learning and instruction. European research in an international context, Vol. 3 (pp. 365-375). Elsmford, NY: Pergamon Press
  6. Ulu, C. (2011). The effect of using inquiry based approach known as the science writing heuristic on concept learning, science process and metacognition skills in science teaching. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazemian, M., Irawan, L. A., & Haerazi, H.
Affiliations
Guilan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Venue
Journal of Language and Literature Studies
Published
2021-05-30
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
15-28
ISSN
2808-1099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296749998
Cited by
31
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Language and Literature Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
writing skills, critical thinking skills, pre-service teachers, teacher professional development, metacognitive awareness, writing instruction, Indonesian higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review