Cited by 37Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures for the millennial aesthetic patient

Mobayed, Nisreen, Nguyen, Julie, Jagdeo, Jared·2020·Journal of Drugs in Dermatology

Abstract

Millennials, defined as the generation of individuals born between 1981 and 1996, have emerged as one of the leading patient demographics seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Worldwide, millennials are more likely to consider preventative treatments compared to any other age-group. The three most popular minimally invasive facial procedures in this demographic include botulinum toxin, dermal fillers (eg, hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxylapatite, facial fat-fillers), and microdermabrasion. Given their impact on the expanding aesthetic medicine market and their favorable disposition towards cosmetic procedures, it is necessary for dermatologists and cosmetic providers to understand their motivations and perspectives. While some research studies have elicited the opinions of millennials on social issues, education, and technology, there is a paucity of literature on millennials' impressions, opinions, and perceptions of aesthetic procedures. As a generation that has been reshaping the culture of healthcare delivery and encouraging the innovation of products and procedures with their unique values and perspectives, accounting for their beliefs and fostering a better understanding of their experiences will promote an elevation in the quality of their care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36849/jdd.2020.4641

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most notable change in cosmetic dermatology over the past 2 decades is the shift from correction and reversal treatments for millennials to preventive measures for Gen Z.

    “The most notable change in cosmetic dermatology over the past 2 decades lies in the shift from correction and reversal treatments for millennials to preventive measures for Gen Z.3‐5”

    From Prejuvenation: The Global New Anti-Aging Trend (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mobayed, N., Nguyen, J., & Jagdeo, J.
Venue
Journal of Drugs in Dermatology
Publisher
SanovaWorks
Published
2019-12-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
100-103
ISSN
1545-9616 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3028089732
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
millennials, minimally invasive cosmetic procedures, facial aesthetics, botulinum toxin, dermal fillers, hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxyapatite, microdermabrasion, patient perspectives
MeSH terms
Dermal Fillers, Adult, Age Factors, Cosmetic Techniques, Esthetics, Face, Humans, Motivation, Rejuvenation, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Skin Aging, Botulinum Toxins, Type A, Young Adult, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review