The baseline fluid intelligence modulated the transfer effect from working memory to fluid intelligence
Abstract
摘要： 本研究考察了流体智力基线水平对工作记忆训练迁移效果的影响。采用前后测设计, 以视觉和听觉双任务n-back作为工作记忆训练任务, 对训练组进行为期一个月的训练; 积极对照组采用阅读任务进行训练。结果发现积极控制组的流体智力水平在基线与后测之间无显著变化; 而训练组流体智力水平在后测时与基线相比有显著提高, 且工作记忆训练提升量越大的个体其流体智力改善越大。说明认知训练有效迁移到了流体智力水平的改善上。我们还发现流体智力基线水平调节了工作记忆训练对流体智力水平的迁移, 即工作记忆训练提升量越大, 流体智力改善值越大, 对于那些流体智力基线水平较高的人来说, 工作记忆训练对流体智力改善的效果更大。流体智力基线水平、工作记忆训练提升量及两者的乘积共同影响了流体智力改善值。这一结果表明个体差异如流体智力基线水平可以调节工作记忆训练对流体智力水平的迁移。
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relationship between baseline and training-related gains or transfer is inconsistent across studies.
“the relationship between baseline and training-related gains or transfer is inconsistent across studies (Jaeggi et al., 2008; Wiemers et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2017)”
From The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Fu, J., Zhou, Y., Yuan, M., & Cai, Y. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-026-02994-5
“Although headroom accounts are frequently linked to lower baseline performance in younger samples, the relationship between baseline and training-related gains or transfer is inconsistent across studies (Jaeggi et al., 2008; Wiemers et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2017).”
- Authors
- ZHU, Z., DUAN, Y., & WANG, S.
- Affiliations
- Jiangsu Normal University (CN)
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica Sinica
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1022
- ISSN
- 0439-755X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2738562233
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychologica Sinica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- fluid intelligence, working memory training, transfer effects, individual differences, n-back task, dual-task training, cognitive training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
