Cited by 15Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

Decision-Making in the Age of AI: A Review of Theoretical Frameworks, Computational Tools, and Human-Machine Collaboration

Open access
Wei, Jian, Qi, Sun, Wang, Wanjiang, Jiang, Liuyan, Gao, Huihui, Zhao, Feng, Al-Bukhaiti, Khalil, Wan, Anping·2025·Contemporary Mathematics

Abstract

Decision-making, a critical process across all disciplines, is undergoing significant transformation with the integration of advanced computational techniques. This review examines the evolution of decision-making, from its theoretical foundations to the implementation of optimization algorithms, neural networks, and artificial intelligence (AI). The review first explores the contrasting paradigms of normative and descriptive decision-making theories. Normative theories propose ideal decision-making processes based on rational calculations, while descriptive theories aim to explain real-world human decision-making, often incorporating cognitive biases and heuristics. Subsequently, the review investigates optimization techniques focusing on neural networks and deep learning. These powerful tools enable machines to learn complex patterns from data, facilitating tasks such as classification, prediction, and decision-making. Various neural network architectures, including feedforward networks, convolutional networks, and recurrent networks, are examined, highlighting their distinctive strengths and limitations. The review further explores the integration of AI in decision-making processes, examining its impact on organizational structures and the inherent challenges of human-machine collaboration within uncertain environments. While AI excels at analyzing vast datasets and identifying patterns, human judgment remains indispensable for strategic decisions, particularly in areas requiring implicit knowledge, ethical considerations, and navigating complex uncertainties. The review concludes by examining the ethical implications of AI-driven decisions and explores the potential for a future where AI effectively augments human capabilities. The need for AI literacy, transparency, and a thoughtful approach to integrating AI into decision-making processes is emphasized, aiming to maximize its benefits while mitigating risks. The review highlights the emergence of human-AI partnerships, where AI enhances human capabilities. Still, human oversight and judgment remain critical for navigating the complexities of strategic decision-making in a world marked by increasing uncertainty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37256/cm.6220256459

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, J., Qi, S., Wang, W., Jiang, L., Gao, H., Zhao, F., Al-Bukhaiti, K., & Wan, A.
Affiliations
  • China Tobacco (CN)
  • Hangzhou City University (CN)
Venue
Contemporary Mathematics
Published
2025-03-25
Pages
2089-2112
ISSN
  • 2705-1056 (ISSN-L)
  • 2705-1064
OpenAlex
W4408817443
Cited by
15
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 3
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Contemporary Mathematics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Keywords
decision-making, artificial intelligence, normative decision theory, descriptive decision theory, cognitive biases, heuristics, artificial neural networks, deep learning, optimization algorithms, human-machine collaboration, AI ethics, AI literacy, human oversight, strategic decision-making, uncertainty, human-AI collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review