Cited by 641Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing

Open access
von Krogh, Georg·2018·Academy of Management Discoveries

Abstract

ISSN:2168-1007

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amd.2018.0084

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Answering the research questions on human-AI collaboration in innovation will often best be achieved through inductive and abductive rather than deductive reasoning.

    “Hence, answering these questions will often best be achieved through inductive and abductive, rather than deductive reasoning (Amabile, 2020; Bamberger, 2018; von Krogh, 2018).”

    From Augmenting human innovation teams with artificial intelligence: Exploring transformer-based language models (2023) · cites this paper as von Krogh, 2018

    In “Making Decisions with Intelligent Machines” (p. 4), the paper says AI decision-making questions are particularly suitable for abductive reasoning; “Solving Problems with Intelligent Machines” (p. 5) also proposes an abductive research program. It does not establish that inductive reasoning is preferable to deductive reasoning for questions about human–AI collaboration in innovation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both traditional and non-traditional work settings will be increasingly shaped by the interaction of human and machine authority regimes.

    “As von Krogh (2018) explains, both tradi-tional and non-traditional work settings will be increas-ingly shaped by the “interaction of human and machine authority regimes” (p.406).”

    From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as von Krogh, 2018

    In “Making Decisions with Intelligent Machines” (p. 4), von Krogh anticipates research into the emergence and interaction of human and machine authority regimes in organizations. The passage does not distinguish traditional from non-traditional work settings or assert that both will increasingly be shaped by that interaction; it frames the interaction as something researchers may explain. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing research has identified that collective intelligence-a symbiotic partnership between AI and human intelligence-increases the capability of human workers, leading to higher employee productivity, better psychological outcomes, low turnover, and improved quality of outputs.

    “In this context, existing research has identified the importance of collective intelligence, i.e., symbiotic partnership between AI and HI, and how this will also increase the capability of human workers, which will lead to higher employee productivity, better psychological outcomes, low turn-over and improved quality of outputs (Glikson and Wooley, 2020;Murray et al., 2020;von Krogh, 2018).”

    From Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework (2023) · cites this paper as von Krogh, 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rallying support within and outside an organization remains a profoundly human capability.

    “Rallying support within and outside an organization remains a profoundly human capability (von Krogh, 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
  2. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. 1972. Human problem solving, vol. 104, no. (9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Schwarting, W., Alonso-Mora, J., & Rus, D. 2018. Planning and decision making for autonomous vehicles. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 6(59): 8.1-8.24.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Krogh, G.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich
Venue
Academy of Management Discoveries
Published
2018-12
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
404-409
ISSN
2168-1007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906095734
Cited by
641
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 153 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
14.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academy of Management Discoveries (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
artificial intelligence in organizations, artificial intelligence adoption, organizational theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review