Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing
Open accessAbstract
ISSN:2168-1007
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Answering the research questions on human-AI collaboration in innovation will often best be achieved through inductive and abductive rather than deductive reasoning.
“Hence, answering these questions will often best be achieved through inductive and abductive, rather than deductive reasoning (Amabile, 2020; Bamberger, 2018; von Krogh, 2018).”
From Augmenting human innovation teams with artificial intelligence: Exploring transformer-based language models (2023) · cites this paper as von Krogh, 2018
In “Making Decisions with Intelligent Machines” (p. 4), the paper says AI decision-making questions are particularly suitable for abductive reasoning; “Solving Problems with Intelligent Machines” (p. 5) also proposes an abductive research program. It does not establish that inductive reasoning is preferable to deductive reasoning for questions about human–AI collaboration in innovation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBoth traditional and non-traditional work settings will be increasingly shaped by the interaction of human and machine authority regimes.
“As von Krogh (2018) explains, both tradi-tional and non-traditional work settings will be increas-ingly shaped by the “interaction of human and machine authority regimes” (p.406).”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as von Krogh, 2018
In “Making Decisions with Intelligent Machines” (p. 4), von Krogh anticipates research into the emergence and interaction of human and machine authority regimes in organizations. The passage does not distinguish traditional from non-traditional work settings or assert that both will increasingly be shaped by that interaction; it frames the interaction as something researchers may explain. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting research has identified that collective intelligence-a symbiotic partnership between AI and human intelligence-increases the capability of human workers, leading to higher employee productivity, better psychological outcomes, low turnover, and improved quality of outputs.
“In this context, existing research has identified the importance of collective intelligence, i.e., symbiotic partnership between AI and HI, and how this will also increase the capability of human workers, which will lead to higher employee productivity, better psychological outcomes, low turn-over and improved quality of outputs (Glikson and Wooley, 2020;Murray et al., 2020;von Krogh, 2018).”
From Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework (2023) · cites this paper as von Krogh, 2018
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRallying support within and outside an organization remains a profoundly human capability.
“Rallying support within and outside an organization remains a profoundly human capability (von Krogh, 2018).”
From Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A partnership between human and AI (2023) · cites this paper as von Krogh, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.2.i · Cited by 8,221 · see citing works
The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.184834 · Cited by 4,401 · see citing works
Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607081138 · Cited by 3,248 · see citing works
The structure of ill structured problems
Simon, H. A. (1973) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8 · Cited by 2,600 · see citing works
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451 · see citing works
(2006) · Cited by 2,256 · see citing works
Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol
Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392467 · Cited by 1,724 · see citing works
Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice
March, J. G. (1978) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003600 · Cited by 1,539 · see citing works
A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0093 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work
Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0200 · Cited by 1,286 · see citing works
Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox: The Problem Is How We Think about the Problem
Miron‐Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0594 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Martinez, D. L., & Brusoni, S. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2774 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
von Krogh, G., & Röös, J. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24034-0 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
CROSSROADS—Identifying Viable “Need–Solution Pairs”: Problem Solving Without Problem Formulation
von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.1023 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
The Limits to Specialization: Problem Solving and Coordination in ‘Modular Networks’
Brusoni, S. (2005) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840605059161 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
AMD—Clarifying What We Are about and Where We Are Going
Bamberger, P. A. (2018) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2018.0003 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Modelling Bounded Rationality in Organizations: Progress and Prospects
Puranam, P., Stieglitz, N., Osman, M., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2015.1024498 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Coordinating Knowledge Creation in Multidisciplinary Teams: Evidence from Early-Stage Drug Discovery
Ben‐Menahem, S. M., von Krogh, G., Erden, Z., & Schneider, A. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.1214 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
Flasiński, M. (2016) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40022-8 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Approaches to abductive reasoning: an overview
Paul, G. (1993) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/bf00849080 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Extensionally defining principles and cases in ethics: An AI model
McLaren, B. (2003) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00135-8 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
When Two Bosses Are Better Than One: Nearly Decomposable Systems and Organizational Adaptation
Levinthal, D. A., & Workiewicz, M. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1177 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Formulating the mess: The role of decision aids in problem formulation
Schwenk, C. R., & Thomas, H. (1983) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(83)90049-x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence: Prediction versus Judgment
Agrawal, A. K., Gans, J. S., & Avi Goldfarb, B. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24626 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Organization Structure and Complex Problem Solving
Becker, S. W., & Baloff, N. (1969) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391104 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Puranam, P., Shrestha, Y. R., He, V. F., & von Krogh, G. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3140617 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
- Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. 1972. Human problem solving, vol. 104, no. (9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Schwarting, W., Alonso-Mora, J., & Rus, D. 2018. Planning and decision making for autonomous vehicles. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 6(59): 8.1-8.24.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611 · see citing works
“The layered nature of the potential disruptions in the introduction of AI in the public sector calls for a renewed research agenda, and new theorisation e ff orts (von Krogh, 2018).”
BackgroundChowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., & Mikalef, P. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.045 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Lebovitz, S., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Levina, N. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1549 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A partnership between human and AI
Jarrahi, M. H., Askay, D., Eshraghi, A., & Smith, P. (2023) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2022.03.002 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Managing artificial intelligence
Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16274 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Humans and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations
Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. G. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0186 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Algorithmic management in a work context
Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211020332 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
“As von Krogh (2018) explains, both traditional and non-traditional work settings will be increasingly shaped by the “interaction of human and machine authority regimes” (p.406).”
BackgroundEthical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies
Ashok, M., Madan, R., Joha, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Bouschery, S. G., Blazevic, V., & Piller, F. T. (2023) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12656 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Man Tang, P., Koopman, J., McClean, S. T., Zhang, J. H., Li, C. H., De Cremer, D., Lu, Y., & Ng, C. T. S. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1516 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Gama, F., & Magistretti, S. (2025) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12698 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations
Grønsund, T., & Aanestad, M. (2020) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101614 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
“More nuanced accounts instead emphasize interrelation and augmentation (Bailey and Barley, 2019; von Krogh, 2018; Markus, 2017; Davenport and Kirby, 2016), where humans and algorithms interact to perform a task.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe dark sides of people analytics: Reviewing the perils for organisations and employees
Giermindl, L. M., Strich, F., Christ, O., Leicht-Deobald, U., & Redzepi, A. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1927213 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Schachner, T., Keller, R., & v Wangenheim, F. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20701 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making
Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., Dierckx, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106730 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Strich, F., University of Bayreuth, G., Mayer, A.-S., University of Passau, G., Fiedler, M., & University of Passau, G. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00663 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
“Institutions are increasingly introducing AI systems in the workplace (Brynjolfsson & Mitchell, 2017; von Krogh, 2018).”
BackgroundZhang, D., Pee, L. G., & Cui, L. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102304 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Humans as Creativity Gatekeepers: Are We Biased Against AI Creativity?
Magni, F., Park, J., & Chao, M. M. (2024) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-023-09910-x · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Keding, C., & Meissner, P. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120970 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Waardenburg, L., Huysman, M., & Sergeeva, A. V. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1544 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences
Deranty, J.-P., & Corbin, T. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01496-x · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“From this point of view, AI-based algorithmic management offers organisations the chance to delegate decision-making power to more efficient and effective managers (Von Krogh 2018; Araujo et al. 2020).”
Patnaik, P., & Bakkar, M. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102750 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Stavropoulou, C., Narasinkan, R., Baker, A., & Scarbrough, H. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06861-y · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Effective human–AI work design for collaborative decision-making
Jain, R., Garg, N., & Khera, S. N. (2023) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-04-2022-0548 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Hard choices in artificial intelligence
Dobbe, R., Krendl Gilbert, T., & Mintz, Y. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103555 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Ramaul, L., Ritala, P., Kostis, A., & Aaltonen, P. (2026) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13246 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Predictors of NFT Prices: An Automated Machine Learning Approach
Alon, I., Bretas, V. P. G., & Katrih, V. (2023) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.317097 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Herath, S., Bashardoust, A., Bole, Y., & Shrestha, Y. R. (2026) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2026.2616042 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Wei, J., Qi, S., Wang, W., Jiang, L., Gao, H., Zhao, F., Al-Bukhaiti, K., & Wan, A. (2025) · Contemporary Mathematics · doi:10.37256/cm.6220256459 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Researchers emphasize that AI requires well-defined objectives, as it struggles with managing uncertainty and processing complex inputs [102, 119, 122].”
Influential
- Authors
- von Krogh, G.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich
- Venue
- Academy of Management Discoveries
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 404-409
- ISSN
- 2168-1007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2906095734
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Academy of Management Discoveries (publishedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in organizations, artificial intelligence adoption, organizational theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review