The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The age and diversification of the angiosperms re‐revisited
Abstract
• Premise of the study: It has been 8 years since the last comprehensive analysis of divergence times across the angiosperms. Given recent methodological improvements in estimating divergence times, refined understanding of relationships among major angiosperm lineages, and the immense interest in using large angiosperm phylogenies to investigate questions in ecology and comparative biology, new estimates of the ages of the major clades are badly needed. Improved estimations of divergence times will concomitantly improve our understanding of both the evolutionary history of the angiosperms and the patterns and processes that have led to this highly diverse clade. • Methods: We simultaneously estimated the age of the angiosperms and the divergence times of key angiosperm lineages, using 36 calibration points for 567 taxa and a “relaxed clock” methodology that does not assume any correlation between rates, thus allowing for lineage‐specific rate heterogeneity. • Key results: Based on the analysis for which we set fossils to fit lognormal priors, we obtained an estimated age of the angiosperms of 167–199 Ma and the following age estimates for major angiosperm clades: Mesangiospermae (139–156 Ma); Gunneridae (109–139 Ma); Rosidae (108–121 Ma); Asteridae (101–119 Ma). • Conclusions: With the exception of the age of the angiosperms themselves, these age estimates are generally younger than other recent molecular estimates and very close to dates inferred from the fossil record. We also provide dates for all major angiosperm clades (including 45 orders and 335 families [208 stem group age only, 127 both stem and crown group ages], sensu APG III). Our analyses provide a new comprehensive source of reference dates for major angiosperm clades that we hope will be of broad utility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees
Drummond, A. J., & Rambaut, A. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 · Cited by 12,919
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463
THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (2009) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x · Cited by 4,854
Apg (2009) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · Cited by 3,627
Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins.
ZUCKERKANDL, E., & PAULING, L. (1965) · Evolving Genes and Proteins · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6 · Cited by 3,020
Wilson, E. O. (1992) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 2,468
Sanderson, M. J. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003974 · Cited by 1,977
Sanderson, M. J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301 · Cited by 1,906
Bayesian Phylogenetic Analysis of Combined Data
Nylander, J. A. A., Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Nieves-Aldrey, J. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490264699 · Cited by 1,845
Cited by
Phylogenomics reveals multiple losses of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis
Griesmann, M., Chang, Y., Liu, X., Song, Y., Haberer, G., Crook, M. B., Billault-Penneteau, B., Lauressergues, D., Keller, J., Imanishi, L., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat1743 · Cited by 429
Sauquet, H., Ho, S. Y. W., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., Wilf, P., Cantrill, D. J., Bayly, M. J., Bromham, L., Brown, G. K., Carpenter, R. J., et al. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr116 · Cited by 423
Alix, K., Gérard, P. R., Schwarzacher, T., & Heslop-Harrison, J. S. (. (2017) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcx079 · Cited by 420
Plastid phylogenomic insights into relationships of all flowering plant families
Li, H.-T., Luo, Y., Gan, L., Ma, P.-F., Gao, L.-M., Yang, J.-B., Cai, J., Gitzendanner, M. A., Fritsch, P. W., Zhang, T., et al. (2021) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-021-01166-2 · Cited by 259
Self-citationMolecular and fossil evidence on the origin of angiosperms
Doyle, J. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105313 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, C. D., Soltis, D. E., & Soltis, P. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1296-1303
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2169065738
- Cited by
- 819
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 62.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The age and diversification of the angiosperms re‐revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.0900346
- The paper
- Bell, C. D., Soltis, D. E., & Soltis, P. S. (2010). The age and diversification of the angiosperms re‐revisited. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.