Cited by 109Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

Acid suppressive drugs and gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Open access
Ahn, Jeong Soo·2013·World Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the association between acid suppressive drug use and the development of gastric cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of relevant studies that were published through June 2012 was conducted using the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The search included observational studies on the use of histamine 2-receptor antagonists (H₂RAs) or proton pump inhibitors and the associated risk of gastric cancer, which was measured using the adjusted odds ratio (OR) or the relative risk and 95%CI. An independent extraction was performed by two of the authors, and a consensus was reached. RESULTS: Of 4595 screened articles, 11 observational studies (n = 94558) with 5980 gastric cancer patients were included in the final analyses. When all the studies were pooled, acid suppressive drug use was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer risk (adjusted OR = 1.42; 95%CI: 1.29-1.56, I² = 48.9%, P = 0.034). The overall risk of gastric cancer increased among H₂RA users (adjusted OR = 1.40; 95%CI: 1.24-1.59, I² = 59.5%, P = 0.008) and PPI users (adjusted OR = 1.39; 95%CI: 1.19-1.64, I² = 0.0%, P = 0.377). CONCLUSION: Acid suppressive drugs are associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer. Further studies are needed to test the effect of acid suppressive drugs on gastric cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3748/wjg.v19.i16.2560

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies and meta-analyses report an increased risk of developing GC in long-term PPI users up to 2.4 times greater, even after H. pylori eradication.

    “with some studies and meta-analyses reporting an increased risk of developing GC in long-term PPI users[62,63] up to 2.4 times greater, even after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, according to a recent study[64]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahn, J. S.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Jeong Soo
Venue
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2013
Volume
19
Issue
16
Pages
2560
ISSN
1007-9327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056076454
Cited by
109
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • World Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • National Cancer Institute (R25CA087949)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Keywords
acid-suppressive drugs, gastric cancer, H2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, gastric cancer risk, drug-induced cancer risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Histamine H2 Antagonists, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Stomach Neoplasms, Odds Ratio, Risk Assessment, Proton Pump Inhibitors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review