The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Open accessAbstract
Every colorectal surgeon during his or her career is faced with anastomotic leakage (AL); one of the most dreaded complications following any type of gastrointestinal anastomosis due to increased risk of morbidity, mortality, overall impact on functional and oncologic outcome and drainage on hospital resources. In order to understand and give an overview of the AL risk factors in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, we carried out a careful review of the existing literature on this topic and found several different definitions of AL which leads us to believe that the lack of a consensual, standard definition can partly explain the considerable variations in reported rates of AL in clinical studies. Colorectal leak rates have been found to vary depending on the anatomic location of the anastomosis with reported incidence rates ranging from 0 to 20%, while the laparoscopic approach to colorectal resections has not yet been associated with a significant reduction in AL incidence. As well, numerous risk factors, though identified, lack unanimous recognition amongst researchers. For example, the majority of papers describe the risk factors for left-sided anastomosis, the principal risk being male sex and lower anastomosis, while little data exists defining AL risk factors in a right colectomy. Also, gut microbioma is gaining an emerging role as potential risk factor for leakage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: The impact of fibrin glue
Huh, J. W., Kim, H. R., & Kim, Y. J. (2010) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.018 · Cited by 114
Silva-Velazco, J., Stocchi, L., Costedio, M., Gorgun, E., Kessler, H., & Remzi, F. H. (2016) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4651-6 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Sciuto, A., Merola, G., Palma, G. D. D., Sodo, M., Pirozzi, F., Bracale, U. M., & Bracale, U.
- Venue
- World Journal of Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
- Published
- 2018-06-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2247-2260
- ISSN
- 1007-9327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2805659832
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3748/wjg.v24.i21.2247
- The paper
- Sciuto, A., Merola, G., Palma, G. D. D., Sodo, M., Pirozzi, F., Bracale, U. M., & Bracale, U. (2018). Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i21.2247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.