The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current perspectives in medical image perception
Open accessAbstract
Medical images constitute a core portion of the information a physician utilizes to render diagnostic and treatment decisions. At a fundamental level, this diagnostic process involves two basic processes: visually inspecting the image (visual perception) and rendering an interpretation (cognition). The likelihood of error in the interpretation of medical images is, unfortunately, not negligible. Errors do occur, and patients’ lives are impacted, underscoring our need to understand how physicians interact with the information in an image during the interpretation process. With improved understanding, we can develop ways to further improve decision making and, thus, to improve patient care. The science of medical image perception is dedicated to understanding and improving the clinical interpretation process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness
Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3 · Cited by 5,457
Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: Prospects for the future
Weinstein, R. S., Graham, A. R., Richter, L. C., Barker, G. P., Krupinski, E. A., Lopez, A. M., Erps, K. A., Bhattacharyya, A. K., Yagi, Y., & Gilbertson, J. R. (2009) · Human Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.006 · Cited by 380
Self-citationDiagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality Using a Digital Camera for Teledermatology
Krupinski, E. A., LeSueur, B., Ellsworth, L., Levine, N., Hansen, R., Silvis, N., Sarantopoulos, P., Hite, P., Wurzel, J., Weinstein, R. S., et al. (1999) · Telemedicine Journal · doi:10.1089/107830299312005 · Cited by 154 · cited 1×
“For example, we conducted a teledermatology study using 308 cases, each diagnosed in person and then via digitally acquired images displayed on a color monitor (Krupinski et al., 1999).”
MethodSelf-citationNakajima, Y., Yamada, K., Imamura, K., & Kobayashi, K. (2008) · Radiation Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11604-008-0259-2 · Cited by 97
Cited by
Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Säljö, R. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7 · Cited by 715
Bruno, M. A., Walker, E. A., & Abujudeh, H. H. (2015) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.2015150023 · Cited by 573
Majkowska, A., Mittal, S., Steiner, D. F., Reicher, J. J., McKinney, S. M., Duggan, G. E., Eswaran, K., Cameron Chen, P.-H., Liu, Y., Kalidindi, S. R., et al. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019191293 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Krupinski, E. A.
- Venue
- Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
- Published
- 2010-06-30
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1205-1217
- ISSN
- 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-393X
- OpenAlex
- W2052244801
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current perspectives in medical image perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/app.72.5.1205
- The paper
- Krupinski, E. A. (2010). Current perspectives in medical image perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/app.72.5.1205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
