Cited by 715Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesData Visualization and AnalyticsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Expertise Differences in the Comprehension of Visualizations: a Meta-Analysis of Eye-Tracking Research in Professional Domains

Gegenfurtner, Andreas, Lehtinen, Erno, Säljö, Roger·2011·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the development of domain-specific expertise, those with more experience are thought to be able to chunk related concepts together in elaborated schemas, thus maximizing the efficiency of their working memory.

    “With the development of domain-specific expertise, those with more experience are thought to be able to chunk related concepts together in elaborated schemas, thus maximizing the efficiency of their working memory (Gegenfurtner et al. 2011;Sweller et al. 1998).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Säljö, R.
Affiliations
University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Gegenfurtner, Andreas
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2011-07-26
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
523-552
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W1987675072
Cited by
715
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
expertise differences, visualization comprehension, eye movements, fixation, saccades, long-term working memory, visual expertise, novices and experts, parafoveal processing, selective attention, visualization design, learning environment design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review