Cited by 280Multisensory perception and integrationNeuroscience and Music PerceptionTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Audio–visual simultaneity judgments

Open access

Abstract

The relative spatiotemporal correspondence between sensory events affects multisensory integration across a variety of species; integration is maximal when stimuli in different sensory modalities are presented from approximately the same position at about the same time. In the present study, we investigated the influence of spatial and temporal factors on audio-visual simultaneity perception in humans. Participants made unspeeded simultaneous versus successive discrimination responses to pairs of auditory and visual stimuli presented at varying stimulus onset asynchronies from either the same or different spatial positions using either the method of constant stimuli (Experiments 1 and 2) or psychophysical staircases (Experiment 3). The participants in all three experiments were more likely to report the stimuli as being simultaneous when they originated from the same spatial position than when they came from different positions, demonstrating that the apparent perception of multisensory simultaneity is dependent on the relative spatial position from which stimuli are presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03193329

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 75 references

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bertelson, P. (1998). Starting from the ventriloquist: The perception of multimodal events. In M. Sabourin, F. I. M. Craik, & M. Robert (Eds.),Advances in psychological science: Vol. 2. Biological and cognitive aspects (pp. 419–439). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
  2. Guinzberg, R. L. (1928). È possibile l’apprendimento di sensazioni eterogenee come perfettamente simultanee?[Is it possible to learn that heterogeneous sensations are perfectly simultaneous?] Archivi Italiani di Psicologia,6, 103–114.
  3. Michotte, A. (1912). Nouvelles recherches sur la simultanéité apparente d’impressions disparates périodiques (expérience de complication) [New research on the apparent simultaneity of periodic heterogeneous stimuli (complication situation)].Annales de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie,1, 571–663.
  4. Raizada, R. D. S., &Poldrack, R. A. (2001). Event-related fMRI of audio—visual simultaneity perception.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,14 (Suppl.), 172.
  5. Rihs, S. (1995). The influence of audio on perceived picture quality and subjective audio—visual delay tolerance. In R. Hamberg & H. de Ridder (Eds.),Proceedings of the MOSAIC workshop: Advanced methods for the evaluation of television picture quality (pp. 133-137). Eindhoven.
  6. Scheier, C. R., Nijhawan, R., &Shimojo, S. (1999). Sound alters visual temporal resolution.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,40, S792.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–280 of 280

Metadata

Authors
Zampini, M., Guest, S., Shore, D. I., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Zampini, Massimiliano
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
2005-04
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
531-544
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W2013674599
Cited by
280
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
multisensory integration, stimulus onset asynchrony, spatial location, temporal correspondence, cross-modal perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Cues, Humans, Judgment, Space Perception, Time Factors, Visual Acuity, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review