The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS)
Taft, M. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90544-9 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Cited by
A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading
van Orden, G. C. (1987) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197716 · Cited by 867
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 · Cited by 791
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0023851 · Cited by 595
Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative?
Hay, J. (2001) · Linguistics · doi:10.1515/ling.2001.041 · Cited by 581
MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers
Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195560 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Taft, M.
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 1979-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 263-272
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- OpenAlex
- W2002645232
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03197599
- The paper
- Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
