Cited by 301Visual perception and processing mechanismsCognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli

Open access
Eng, Hing Yee, Chen, Diyu, Jiang, Yuhong·2005·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Does the magical number four characterize our visual working memory (VWM) capacity for all kinds of objects, or is the capacity of VWM inversely related to the perceptual complexity of those objects? To find out how perceptual complexity affects VWM, we used a change detection task to measure VWM capacity for six types of stimuli of different complexity: colors, letters, polygons, squiggles, cubes, and faces. We found that the estimated capacity decreased for more complex stimuli, suggesting that perceptual complexity was an important factor in determining VWM capacity. However, the considerable correlation between perceptual complexity and VWM capacity declined significantly if subjects were allowed to view the sample memory display longer. We conclude that when encoding limitations are minimized, perceptual complexity affects, but does not determine, VWM capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03206454

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eng, H. Y., Chen, D., & Jiang, Y.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Eng, Hing Yee
  • Jiang, Yuhong
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2005-12
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1127-1133
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2124750986
Cited by
301
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 24
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0345525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
visual working memory, working memory capacity, perceptual complexity, change detection, memory encoding, face memory, color memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Memory, Reaction Time, Saccades, Visual Perception, Signal Detection, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review