Cited by 96Reading and Literacy DevelopmentVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Letter legibility and visual word recognition

Open access
Nazir, Tatjana A., Jacobs, Arthur M., O’Regan, J. Kevin·1998·Memory & Cognition

Abstract

Word recognition performance varies systematically as a function of where the eyes fixate in the word. Performance is maximal with the eye slightly left of the center of the word and decreases drastically to both sides of this optimal viewing position. While manipulations of lexical factors have only marginal effects on this phenomenon, previous studies have pointed to a relation between the viewing position effect (VPE) and letter legibility: When letter legibility drops, the VPE becomes more exaggerated. To further investigate this phenomenon, we improved letter legibility by magnifying letter size in a way that was proportional to the distance from fixation (e.g., TABLE). Contrary to what would be expected if the VPE were due to limits of acuity, improving the legibility of letters has only a restricted influence on performance. In particular, for long words, a strong VPE remains even when letter legibility is equalized across eccentricities. The failure to neutralize the VPE is interpreted in terms of perceptual learning: Since normally, because of acuity limitations, the only information available in parafoveal vision concerns low-resolution features of letters; even when magnification provides better information, readers are unable to make use of it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03211400

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The speed of word recognition is remarkably uninfluenced by the number of letters present in a 3-6-letter word, indicating a form of parallel processing of the letters.

    “Chronometric studies show that the speed of word recognition is remarkably uninfluenced by the number of letters present in a 3-6-letter word, indicating a form of parallel processing of the letters [2].”
  • The perceptual mechanisms that support word recognition rest on a critical process that groups the letters of a word together into an integrated perceptual unit (a 'visual word form').

    “Several lines of cognitive evidence indicate that the perceptual mechanisms that support word recognition rest on a critical process that groups the letters of a word together into an integrated perceptual unit (i.e. a 'visual word form').”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. GRIMES, M. (1989). Where first grade children look in words during reading. Unpublished master's thesis, University oflllinois, Urbana- Champaign.
  2. K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: Fromphys- iology to cognition (pp. 459-466). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  3. OLZAK, L. A., & THOMAS, J. P. (1986). Seeing spatial patterns. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & 1. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook ofperception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 7: 1-7:56). New York: Wiley.
  4. RADACH, R., & KEMPE, V. (1993). An individual analysis of initial fix- ation position in reading. In G. d'Ydewalle & 1. van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception & cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 213-225). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nazir, T. A., Jacobs, A. M., & O’Regan, J. K.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Nazir, Tatjana A.
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
1998-07
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
810-821
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W2023856807
Cited by
96
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
visual word recognition, letter legibility, parafoveal vision, perceptual learning, visual acuity, long words, reading
MeSH terms
Adult, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Printing, Reading, Visual Fields, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review