Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala

Open access
Mumby, Dave G., Wood, Emma R., Pinel, John P. J.·1992·Psychobiology

Abstract

Rats were trained on the nonspatial delayed nonmatching-to-sample task that we recently developed to mimic the task that is commonly used to study amnesia in monkeys. The rats were tested at retention delays of 4, 15, 60, 120, and 600 sec, both before and after surgery. Each experimental rat received bilateral lesions of the hippocampus, amygdala, or both. In comparison to no-surgery control rats, the rats in each of the three experimental groups were significantly and equally impaired only at the 600-sec delay. These findings indicate that neither separate nor combined lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus cause severe object-recognition impairments in pretrained rats.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03327156

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Mumby, D. G., Wood, E. R., & Pinel, J. P. J.
Venue
Psychobiology
Published
1992-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
18-27
ISSN
0889-6313 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2205418019
Cited by
215
References
0
FWCI
16.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03327156
The paper
Mumby, D. G., Wood, E. R., & Pinel, J. P. J. (1992). Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala. Psychobiology. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03327156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.