The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taboo, emotionally valenced, and emotionally neutral word norms
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a normed study of tabooness (Janschewitz, 2008), all nine were well above the upper quartile (1.57).”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Janschewitz, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0504_2 · Cited by 4,342
Two routes to emotional memory: Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0306408101 · Cited by 848
Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.857 · Cited by 508
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389–410. · DOI
- Anderson, A. K. (2005). Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 258–281. · DOI · Paper page
- Bellezza, F. S., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1986). Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 299–303. · DOI
- Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech. Rep. C-1). Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
- Dewaele, J.-M. (2004). The emotional force of swearwords and taboo words in the speech of multilinguals. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 25, 204–222. · DOI
- Dewhurst, S. A., & Conway, M. A. (1994). Pictures, images, and recollective experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1088–1098. · DOI
- Doerksen, S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2001). Source memory enhancement for emotional words. Emotion, 1, 5–11. · DOI
- Harris, C. L., Ayçiçegi, A., & Gleason, J. B. (2003). Taboo words and reprimands elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first language than in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 561–579. · DOI
- Jay, T. (1992). Cursing in America: A psycholinguistic study of dirty language in the courts, the movies, in the schoolyards, and on the streets. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. · DOI
- Jay, T. (2000). Why we curse: A neuro-psycho-social theory of speech. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Jay, T., Caldwell-Harris, C., & King, K. (2008). Recalling taboo and nontaboo words. American Journal of Psychology, 121, 83–103. · DOI
- Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. (2006, July). Swearing with friends and enemies in high and low places. Paper presented at the Linguistic Impoliteness and Rudeness: Confrontation and Conflict in Discourse Conference, Huddersfield, U.K.
- Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. (2008a). The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research, 4, 267–288.
- Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169–1180. · DOI · Paper page
- Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). A computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
- LaBar, K. S., & Phelps, E. A. (1998). Arousal-mediated memory consolidation: Role of the medial temporal lobe in humans. Psychological Science, 9, 490–493. · DOI
- Mabry, E. (1975). A multivariate investigation of profane language. Central States Speech Journal, 26, 39–44. · DOI
- Maratos, E. J., Allan, K., & Rugg, M. D. (2000). Recognition memory for emotionally negative and neutral words: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1452–1465. · DOI
- Mehl, M. R., Gosling, S. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90, 862–877. · DOI · Paper page
- Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317, 82. · DOI
- O’Neill, W. (2005). Word-imagery effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 100, 716–722. · DOI
- Talmi, D., & Moscovitch, M. (2004). Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words? Memory & Cognition, 32, 742–751. · DOI
- Thomas, L. A., & LaBar, K. S. (2005). Emotional arousal enhances word repetition priming. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 1027–1047. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x · Cited by 1,959
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
Scott, G. G., Keitel, A., Becirspahic, M., Yao, B., & Sereno, S. C. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3 · Cited by 237
Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable
Hunt, M., Cotter, C., Pearson, H., & Stockall, L. (2023) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12588 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Janschewitz, K.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1065-1074
- ISSN
- 1554-351X
- 1554-3528
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
