Cited by 848Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Two routes to emotional memory: Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal

Open access
Kensinger, Elizabeth A., Corkin, Suzanne·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Prior investigations have demonstrated that emotional information is often better remembered than neutral information, but they have not directly contrasted effects attributable to valence and those attributable to arousal. By using functional MRI and behavioral studies, we found that distinct cognitive and neural processes contribute to emotional memory enhancement for arousing information versus valenced, nonarousing information. The former depended on an amygdalar-hippocampal network, whereas the latter was supported by a prefrontal cortex-hippocampal network implicated in controlled encoding processes. A behavioral companion study, with a divided-attention paradigm, confirmed that memory enhancement for valenced, nonarousing words relied on controlled encoding processes: concurrent task performance reduced the enhancement effect. Enhancement for arousing words occurred automatically, even when encoding resources were diverted to the secondary task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0306408101

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This left hippocampus finding is more likely related to encoding salient stimuli in memory than to simulating prior experiences, because the amygdala also had increased activity during fear perception and has functional connectivity with the hippocampus during encoding of salient stimuli.

    “This finding is more likely to be related to the encoding of salient stimuli in memory than simulating prior experiences, as the amygdala also had increased activity during instances of fear perception and is known to have functional connectivity with the hippocampus during encoding of salient stimuli (Kensinger & Corkin 2004).”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Kensinger & Corkin 2004

  • The high (declining) end of the curvilinear component of the Yerkes-Dodson law is generated largely by stress-induced suppression of PFC functioning.

    “We have also suggested that the high (declining) end of the curvilinear component of the Yerkes-Dodson law is generated largely by a stress-induced suppression of PFC functioning (see also Kensinger and Corkin [446] for related discussion).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S.
Affiliations
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-02-23
Volume
101
Issue
9
Pages
3310-3315
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2054446967
Cited by
848
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 54
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG021525, R01AG021525)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR-14075, P41RR014075)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotional memory, valence, arousal, amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, divided attention, emotional words, memory enhancement
MeSH terms
Arousal, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Nerve Net, Neurons, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review