Cited by 7Language and cultural evolutionChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Experimental studies of animal social learning in the wild: Trying to untangle the mystery of human culture

Open access
Hill, K.·2010·Learning & Behavior

Abstract

Here I discuss how studies on animal social learning may help us understand human culture. It is an evolutionary truism that complex biological adaptations always evolve from less complex but related adaptations, but occasionally evolutionary transitions lead to major biological changes whose end products are difficult to anticipate. Language-based cumulative adaptive culture in humans may represent an evolutionary transition of this type. Most of the social learning observed in animals (and even plants) may be due to mechanisms that cannot produce cumulative cultural adaptations. Likewise, much of the critical content of socially transmitted human culture seems to show no parallel in nonhuman species. Thus, with regard to the uniquely human extent and quality of culture, we are forced to ask: Are other species only a few small steps away from this transition, or do they lack multiple critical features that make us the only truly cultural species? Only future research into animal social learning can answer these questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/lb.38.3.319

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultural transmission exists in many species.

    “The capacity for cultural transmission also exists in many species – more than one might imagine, as it is a relatively new topic in animal behavior research (Hill 2010; Laland & Galef 2009; Laland & Hoppitt 2003; Page & Ryan 2006).”

    From Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change (2014) · cites this paper as Hill 2010

    The Conclusion says that some animals pass behavioral traditions between generations, but “they do not transmit cultural content.” In “Experimental and Statistical Techniques to Detect Social Learning” (page unavailable), Hill argues that animal traditions are building blocks of culture rather than culture itself. This contrasts with the claim that cultural transmission exists in many species. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 225-242). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Chapais, B. (2008). Primeval kinship: How pair-bonding gave birth to human society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2001). Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208, 79-89.
  4. Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2007). Dual inheritance theory: The evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 555-570). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Henrich, N., & Henrich, J. (2007). Why humans cooperate: A cultural and evolutionary explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Heyes, C. M. (1996). Identifying and defining imitation. In C. M. Heyes & B. G. Galef, Jr. (Eds.), Social learning in animals: The roots of culture (pp. 211-220). San Diego: Academic Press.
  7. Hill, K. (2009). Animal "culture"? In K. N. Laland & B. G. Galef (Eds.), The question of animal culture (pp. 269-287). Cambridge, MA: Har- vard University Press.
  8. Hill, K., Walker, R., Bozicevic, M., Eder, J., Headland, T., Hew- lett, B., et al. (2010). Kinship coresidence patterns in hunter- gatherer societies. Manuscript under review.
  9. Hopper, L. M. (in press). "Ghost" experiments and the dissection of social learning in humans and animals. Biological Reviews. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00120.x · DOI
  10. Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2003). Animal innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Shea, N. (2009). Imitation as an inheritance system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2429-2443.
  13. Smith, K., & Kirby, S. (2008). Cultural evolution: Implications for un- derstanding the human language faculty and its evolution. Philosophi- cal Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3591-3603.
  14. Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2005). Intention reading and imita- tive learning. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imita- tion: From neuroscience to social science (pp. 133-148). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  15. Trewavas, A. (2003). Aspects of plant intelligence. Annals of Botany, 92, 1-20.
  16. Whiten, A. (2010). Ape behavior and the origins of human culture. In P. M. Kappeler & J. B. Silk (Eds.), Mind the gap: Tracing the origins of human universals (pp. 429-450). Heidelberg: Springer.
  17. Whiten, A., McGuigan, N., Marshall-Pescini, S., & Hopper, L. M. (2009). Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2417-2428.
  18. Karban, R., & Shiojiri, K. (2009). Self-recognition affects plant com- munication and defense. Ecology Letters, 12, 502-506.
  19. Laland, K. N. (2008). Exploring gene-culture interactions: Insights from handedness, sexual selection and niche-construction case stud- ies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3577- 3589.
  20. Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  21. Liebig, J., Peeters, C., & Hölldobler, B. (1999). Worker policing limits the number of reproductives in a ponerine ant. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 1865-1870.
  22. Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  23. MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island bio- geography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  24. Maynard Smith, J., & Szathmáry, E. (1995). The major transitions in evolution. Oxford: W. H. Freeman Spektrum.
  25. McElreath, R., Bell, A. V., Efferson, C., Lubell, M., Richerson, P. J., & Waring, T. (2008). Beyond existence and aiming outside the laboratory: Estimating frequency-dependent and pay-off-biased social learning strategies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3515-3528.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, K.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hill, K.
Venue
Learning & Behavior
Published
2010-07-13
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
319-328
ISSN
  • 1543-4494 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-4508
OpenAlex
W2051696259
Cited by
7
References
68
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
30.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
human culture, cumulative culture, evolutionary transitions, language evolution, social transmission, cultural evolution, comparative cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Culture, Biological Evolution, Humans, Language, Learning, Social Environment, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review